Shah Rukh tweets to seek peace ahead of MNIK release

11/02/2010

New Delhi: Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan, who is in Berlin for the premiere of his film "My Name Is Khan", says he is sad how this movie has generated angst among people despite being created to spread world peace.
"In Berlin. From the Grand Hotel and premiere in Abu Dhabi....sand to snow...the journey has begun...for Khan. Hope it ends well and peacefully. Ironic and sad...a film made for world peace has led to so much angst in my own house, my city, my country. Let not anyone be hurt is all I pray," Shah Rukh posted on his Twitter page.
"Do I say things which are wrong? My wife tells me so. Do I not make myself clear? Some friends feel so. Am I political or politically incorrect?" he added.
The actor is currently under attack by the Shiv Sena for his comments on the inclusion of Pakistani cricketers in the Indian Premier League (IPL) T20 cricket tournament. Shiv Sena had announced a "ban" on "My Name Is Khan" thereafter.
Since Tuesday, its supporters have been vandalising cinema halls and tearing up hoardings around Mumbai, forcing the authorities to arrest over 1,600 of them and to deploy extra policemen around cinema halls, where the movie is releasing Friday.
Shah Rukh, who plays an autistic Muslim Rizwan Khan in the film, also says that he has never attempted to hurt anyone's emotions in any way.
"I have never hurt anybody's sentiments...religious, nationalist or personal wittingly. I am pro relationships but not at cost of my nation...(I am) writing not to justify but to spell out clearly who I am and my beliefs. Seems otherwise I am misunderstood," he said.
He further did a personal rapid fire and posted: "I am Shah Rukh.
Age - 44. Favourite colours - black and white. Job - performing artiste. Likes - to make people smile. Profession - father.
"Nationality - Indian. Born in - Delhi. Owe everything to - Mumbai. Loves - My country India, my family and freedom. Desire - entertain all. Hate - anyone or anything that threatens my country. Wish - world peace, education for all, goodness and no poverty."
"My Name Is Khan", set in post 9/11 US, also features Kajol and has been directed by Karan Johar.
IANS

K.Venugopal
#1
11 February 2010 18:17:08
Shah Rukh Khan describes himself as a "Bloody Indian" in his interview on NDTV with Berkah Dutt. Would he describe himself as a "Bloody Muslim"? Probably not. Just like M.F.Hussain, who would draw a Saraswati or Sita in the nude but would not draw an Ayesha similarly and would not draw a Mohammad at all. Selectively secular, if I may say so.

http://news.in.msn.com/national/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3622939&ucid=294217#uc2Lst294217

UK disputes Shah Rukh's claim on body scanners

Press Trust of India, Thursday February 11, 2010, London

Britain's airport officials have disputed the claim by Indian actor Shah Rukh Khan on a popular television show last week that his naked image taken from body scanners at the Heathrow airport were printed and circulated by staff. Khan claimed on the BBC prime time 'Friday Night with Jonathan Ross' show that female security staff at the airport had printed his naked image from the newly-installed body scanner and that he had autographed them.

However, the British Airports Authority (BAA) said the claim was 'completely factually incorrect' because the body-scanning equipment had no capability to print images. Also, the images captured by the equipment could not be stored or distributed in any form, a BAA spokeswoman said. Speaking on the widely-watched show, Khan said, "I'm always stopped by the security, because of the name. And I think its okay: the western world is a little bit worried, paranoid and touchy, I guess, and freely when they're frisking you".

Khan, who was on a visit here to promote his new film ,'My Name Is Khan', added, "I was in London recently going through the airport and these new machines have come up, the body scans. You've got to see them. It makes you embarrassed if you're not well endowed".

"You walk into the machine and everything, the whole outline of your body comes out. I was a little scared. Something happens [inside the scans], and I came out. Then I saw these girls they had these printouts. I looked at them. I thought they were some forms you had to fill. I said 'give them to me' and you could see everything inside. So I autographed them for them".

The BAA spokeswoman said the scanners had only been brought into use four days before the chat show was recorded and was only used for departing passengers, making it unlikely that Khan would have been put through them. She added that said there would be no investigation into Khan's claims because they "simply could not be true". The decision to install body scanners at UK airports was taken in the wake of the transatlantic Christmas Day terror attack on a plane as it neared Detroit.

Where is the British sense of humour? SRK was obviously cracking a joke.

http://www.ndtv.com/news/world/uk_disputes_shah_rukhs_claim_on_body_scanners.php?page=1#postcommentarea

Why slam SRK and spare Big B? Raj asks Shiv Sena

Mumbai: The Shiv Sena’s protest against actor Shah Rukh Khan’s new movie My Name is Khan is just “noise”, says Maharashtra Navnirman Sena leader Raj Thackeray.
This is for the first time Raj, estranged nephew of Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray, has spoken about his rival party’s protests against the movie. “Such a noise is made over Shah Rukh Khan for this one statement of his. But no one is saying anything about Amitabh Bachchan singing poetry with Pakistanis for a newspaper,” said Raj at a press conference in Mumbai.
"They are demanding an apology from Khan for his remarks on Pakistani players. But Bachchan was seen a couple of days ago sharing the dais with Pakistani artistes and reciting poems. If Khan has to apologise, then why not Bachchan."
“Why is so much controversy/noise being made of this whole thing,” he said
Shiv Sena workers tore up the film's posters on Wednesday, continuing their protest against Khan for backing the participation of Pakistani cricketers in the Indian Premier League. Raj said it was a “mystery” why Khan had not selected Pakistani cricketers for his Kolkata Knightriders team.
“Why Shah Rukh Khan spoke (for Pakistani cricketers), was it for film's publicity? I don’t know, but if he did have sympathy for Pakistan or its players why didn’t he take players during auction it’s a mystery!” he said.
The cast and crew of "My Name is Khan" are attending its premiere in Abu Dhabi and later head to Europe for a screening at the Berlin film festival.
"I hope better sense prevails in Mumbai. We have worked really hard on the movie and we just want people to watch the movie," Khan said at a press conference in Abu Dhabi.

SRK was batting for Pakistan when he made his IPL comments. Big B neither bats nor bowls for Pakistan. Moreover, SRK seems comfortable calling himself a bloody Indian. Big B definitely should shirk at such usage. Raj Thackeray, in any case, is a Marathi Jinnah and therefore he is supporting SRK.

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/why-slam-srk-and-spare-big-b-raj-asks-shiv-sena/109974-3.html?from=tn

Centre okays amnesty for PoK militants; can return home

Updated on Thursday, February 11, 2010, 14:13 IST

New Delhi: In a big confidence building measure for Jammu and Kashmir, the central government has accepted the state's proposal of amnesty to Kashmiri militants in Pakistan who want to return home without weapons and want to join the mainstream, Home Minister P Chidambaram said Thursday.

"The idea of granting amnesty to Kashmiri youth in PoK (Pakistan-occupied Kashmir) has been accepted. The idea must be translated into action now," Chidambaram told reporters here.

The home minister said that the government was now considering how to carry out the process of their return which involves many points to be looked into.

"There are many points for their travel back. Like identification, debriefing, rehabilitation and reintegration into the system," he said.

The announcement will bring cheer to hundreds of families in the Kashmir Valley and other Muslim-dominated areas in Jammu region whose male members had crossed over to Pakistan-administered Kashmir for arms training in the early 1990s and were now willing to return without weapons.


In Pakistani Kashmir they are living in pathetic conditions, doing petty jobs, many of them even begging, according to people who visit the area. They are craving to return home if government gives them amnesty but fear legal action in India.

Chidambaram said the government was willing to facilitate their return.

"They may have gone there for more than one reason but if they want to return we will facilitate," he said.

The home minister said the government would hold discussions with various political parties on the issue.

"Process of wider consultation would be carried and we will consult leader of the opposition and two main political parties in Kashmir," he said about the ruling National Conference and the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

The home minister thus put to rest a row that had erupted after central Health Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad opposed Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's call for rehabilitation of Kashmiri militants.

"PoK (Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir) is an Indian territory, otherwise why should anybody question the idea," Chidambaram said about the controversy that had even threatened the coalition government of the Congress and National Conference.

Abdullah in Delhi last week proposed that a surrender and rehabilitation policy may be framed for the Kashmiri men in Pakistan-administered Kashmir.

But Azad, a former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister, during his visit to Jammu Tuesday said the surrender of the militants on their return from Pakistan could pose a serious danger to security in the state.

The idea to rehabilitate them on humanitarian basis was first floated in May 2006 when Prime Minister Manmohan Singh held the second roundtable conference on Kashmir in Srinagar.

Manmohan Singh had listed this issue as one of the subjects to be looked into for addressing the internal dimension of the Kashmir issue, and at his press conference May 25, 2006, he had stated that talks would be held with Pakistan on this issue.

A working group headed by M Hamid Ansari, now vice-president, had recommended that the government should initiate talks with Pakistan to rehabilitate these youth.

IANS

Amnesty for Kashmiri militants in Pakistan? The government might as well complete its mission of appeasement by announcing amnesty for all the Kashmiri militants in India as well.

http://www.zeenews.com/news603265.html

Kashmiris wanting to return from PoK are welcome: Chidambaram

11/02/2010

New Delhi: In a significant gesture, the government on Thursday said it was ready to "welcome" Kashmiris who had gone to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) if they were ready to return after giving up militancy.
"The idea that any Indian who had crossed over to PoK and wishes to return India is certainly welcome," Home Minister P Chidambaram told reporters backing the proposal mooted by Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah.
"The idea is accepted... This idea must now be translated into a scheme," the Home Minister said, adding it was one of the recommendations of one of the Working Groups appointed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for recommending measures to address problems of Jammu and Kashmir.
Replying to questions at a briefing after meetings of the Cabinet and Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs, Chidambaram said the return could be facilitated through a scheme which will entail identification, screening, travel, debriefing, rehabilitation and reintegration.
Noting that "PoK is actually an Indian territory", he said the government "should facilitate the return" of those who had gone across the Line of Control for "some reasons".
Significantly, his statement counters the view of his Cabinet colleague and former J and K Chief Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad who has questioned the idea of allowing the return as he apprehended that they could come here to "create trouble".
Thousands of Kashmiri youths had crossed over to PoK from 1989 to join militant ranks. While many of them infiltrated back, a large number has not returned. Around 800 of them are understood to have conveyed their desire, through various channels, to return home.
PTI
K.Venugopal
#1
11 February 2010 15:16:57

Is this an invitation to infiltration?

http://news.in.msn.com/international/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3622938&ucid=294107#uc2Lst294107

Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev to enter politics

Zeenews Bureau

Bhubaneswar: After saying no for years, the world renowned Yoga guru Baba Ramdev has finally expressed his desires to enter politics to clean up the political system of the country.

According to reports, the Yoga guru has revealed his intentions to join politics during an interaction with media persons in Bhubaneswar on Wednesday.

Baba Ramdev announced that he plans to enter politics before the 2014 General Elections with an aim to strengthen the roots of Parliamentary democracy and clean up the political system.


However, he had clarified that he would not join any of the existing political party and instead float his own political forum.

The media-savvy yoga guru also shared his disappointment over the rampant corruption in the country and maintained that India could become an economic superpower only if an effective mechanism to tackle corruption is evolved.

Baba Ramdev also shared his views on the row surrounding the introduction of Bt brinjal in India.

The Yoga guru was quoted as saying, “The consumption of genetically modified food is injurious to health as it leads to kidney and liver disorders.

On the ongoing IPL controversy, Baba Ramdev stated that sports alone won’t help bridge the gap between the two hostile neighbours India and Pakistan.

He quizzed that we have been plying cricket for over 60 years but still it has not helped in easing tension. Moreover deliberate attempts have been made to drag sports in politics by the political parties, he added.



Baba Ramdev is no doubt a person of great capacity and stands for the best in Indian culture. A person like him entering politics would have a profound effect. However, to float one's own political party means starting from a scratch. He needs to have people who not only share his vision but also are as pristine in character as he is. The difference he hopes to make would hinge on the type of people who would make up his political party. Here is wishing him all the best.

http://www.zeenews.com/news603226.html

I am a bloody good Indian: SRK to NDTV

Barkha Dutt, Monday February 8, 2010, Mumbai

I feel hurt when people question my Indianness, says Shah Rukh Khan in an exclusive interview to NDTV's Barkha Dutt. He says despite all the success, he still feels powerless at times.

Here's the transcript of the interview:

Barkha Dutt: For the last week or more, Shah Rukh Khan has had India's admiration for standing up unequivocally to the politics of intimidation, even when most hurtfully his patriotism was questioned. To talk about these difficult last days and much much more, we are joined by SRK himself. You are smiling...

SRK: I am smiling because the last time I spoke with you, I wanted to do a fun interview with you. I had sent you a tweet saying that we must do a fun interview, which you have not done, I have not done.

Barkha Dutt: Things are not very funny around here...

SRK: They are not funny...as we were just speaking, that was the last time I tweeted you and I am back and things have changed so much. No fun interview this time too...

Barkha Dutt: We will have our time...but how is it to be back home?

SRK: It is very nice. I was very worried for everyone and when you are not in the house, you hear too many things and you know they are exaggerated but you still worry. But I am happy to be back. I was very happy being there. It was very nice and cold. Went to NASDAQ, did loads of stuff thinking that India has made me so proud and I am a part of all this good stuff happening for the country. And, strangely, you are also faced with the dichotomy that this is also a part of what is happening to the country.

Barkha Dutt: And people are questioning - there you are representing India at the NASDAQ and people are questioning your Indianness, your patriotism.

SRK: And that is one thing no Indian should be questioned on because you don't have to ask and you don't have to explain why you have to love your motherland. How you are and I am, strangely very proud, strangely but naturally, that my dad was a freedom fighter and I don't have very many principles, I am a movie star...(laughs)

Barkha Dutt: You are being self-deprecating as usual...

SRK: No, but you are self-centred, you do your job, you want a comfortable life. You want to have a good life, you want to do entertainment...Maybe I have made compromises in my life and I will never deny that, but I know that I have been a good citizen, I pay my taxes, I try to be okay law-wise and then suddenly you are subjected to questioning of this form and I get very emotional about the things that people say...because my parents gave me nothing else. I am very proud of the Tamrapatra that my father has and I feel very special, especially with the people of my age group because my father was a freedom fighter, he gave me this country. So, I have this strange positive chip on my shoulder that I really like this. And when somebody asks and says that you are not a nice guy and you are not patriotic enough, I find it very strange.

Barkha Dutt: One of your tweets said that you are back and you are busy proving that you are Indian. You were being sarcastic. You know that you don't really have to prove this to 99 per cent of this country. There is that one per cent fringe but....

SRK: Yeah, and it is so strange. I mean everyone knows that Barkha, everybody believes that we cannot start describing one man, two men, ten people's actions to a certain country...and there is nothing wrong. I was watching one of your programmes...I think Mr Pankaj Pachauri...and he was saying something and there were some actors where one of them said that we have some issues with the country and we shouldn't say anything good about it. I say whatever issue we have, let's kill those guys and hang them for troubling India. Let's not even say that we will play cricket with them. Let's not be so insensitive like that. Even if we are being sarcastic, or angry or disturbed and say make that person the captain of your team. That is not right for people who have lost their lives to hear evil or sarcasm or anger or a passionate outburst from anyone and those people should be punished, but the rest of us meet them all over the world...your channel is carrying something about forming relationships and building ties and buses are going to the other side...

Barkha Dutt: The governments are about to begin talking officially...

SRK: Just now? So why is it such a...and sports, every time I know this question has arisen...two years ago they all came and played here...there were no issues...Shoaib Akhtar came and took a lot of wickets...we lost badly to Mumbai Indians...the thing is that sports and culture, these are the things which bind us together. Now those things are being questioned, that is a little sad.

Barkha Dutt: I remember meeting you after 26/11 and I remember how angry you were...it took you a while to come out and speak because you were disturbed by what had happened. Now it is your position on 26/11 which is being questioned. You are being accused of not being sensitive to those who died in 26/11.

SRK: I didn't see it like that...but yeah...

Barkha Dutt: I am not saying that...that is what the people accusing you are saying.

SRK: I think any of us, normal people, who may not have the chance of talking about their patriotism, also how can any one have two different points of view on what happened on 26/11? Naturally we can't have it, we would never have it...because we all know what happened was totally wrong...and here I was trying to, being a Muslim and being an Indian, was trying to say that we should not over-react. And I was saying exactly the same thing actually. Let's not take the side of those people because they are bad human beings but it does not mean that the rest are also like this. Let's try to keep some kind of equilibrium, some kind of sanity...obviously when the government from the other side says that all those people were not from here...those denials are all a part of politics and now it is all coming around and there will be international pressures and it is exactly what I said then that I am saying now. And suddenly on the eve of the release of your film, it starts getting even more vulnerable and disturbing and then there will be the other point of view that this was for publicity...

Barkha Dutt: I have been accused of having a tie-up with you to promote this film...people accusing you are utterly bigoted and revolting...so in some way it is being read that I have a My Name Is Khan (MNIK) tie-up...

SRK: (...laughs...)

Barkha Dutt: But no, more seriously, look back at this week. Did you consider, did you contemplate at any point that this is not worth the fuss...let me go and say sorry.

SRK: As I sit here and talk, I think that it is not worth the fuss, day before yesterday I thought, since the day it started I thought it was not worth the fuss. When I say this I say this with a lot of humility that I am not confrontational about this. I am not scared to be confrontational about any issue that needs confrontation. But this does not need any confrontation. Is it worth the fuss, man...? I will give you an example...If certain things happen with my earlier films, certain people said we don't like this work...we said why, he said my daughter is teased when she uses the word baba...so I felt very bad and I said remove it and everybody told me not to back down but I said I am not backing down. I think if somebody's child feels bad, let it be. There was a set of Muslim people who thought that I had said something wrong in the Marjani song. And I said I didn't mean it, I explained the song to them and I apologised to them...I am not being confrontational. In this case there should have been no fuss. What is the fuss about? And again I say with all humility that we should have good relationships with everybody. And if I have taken the name of Pakistan or any other country what is the harm in it? I have not understood this. So that is why when people tell me are you going to retract, I don't know what to retract? So, here on your show I will say -- let's not be friendly to any country in the world. It's okay, thing over, let my film release with happiness.

Barkha Dutt: I hope Bal Thackeray is watching this interview.

SRK: It's okay, I will say whatever they want me to say or retract. Even if I say this in all seriousness, will that change the fact that we should be friendly to all the neighbouring nations? Who am I? In that programme they said why didn't I buy a Pakistani player? Razzaq...he injured his wrist. At 12 O'clock I had to rush to town...I am not talking about Pak players as from Pakistan. I am talking about them as players. Even if I didn't choose them, it was not based on the fact that they were from Pak but it was based on merit. My team has been losing. I can't take them on an emotional basis.

Barkha Dutt: So are you saying that out of all 12 Pak players, you only found Razzaq wanting on the basis of merit?

SRK: See they are going to have some thoughts now on T20 and at the space we are lying in, I have to go by some thought. We thought it was a secret but six months back people knew that we are trying to buy him. I personally requested so many teams not to buy him because I really needed him but he broke his wrist. There is an issue today if you try to take a Pak player in your team.

Barkha Dutt: Now, what do you mean...this part of your statement did not get enough media attention. There is an issue...what is the issue?

SRK: This is it. I have only said it and the world has broken all around me. So if you are sitting as a businessman you will be skeptical about your choices.

As a team owner, you start thinking should we play or not..there might be some problem...no...good sense prevails but there was a diktat that it shouldn't be allowed.. Australian players? I don't know! Why get into a mess?(Pange mein kyun ghusu?) {vacillating between the two stands..should I or shouldn't I?}

Barkha Dutt: Do you think that's what happened?

SRK- 100 percent!

Barkha Dutt: Do you think the franchisees somewhere decided subconsciously that God knows what happens when we buy a Pak player, koi aur jhanjhat na pad jaaye?

SRK: There were many issues, that of visas, NOCs, security and the main issue was whether they will be allowed to play in Mumbai or not. It is not allowed here.

Barkha Dutt: By whom?

SRK: By groups like the Shiv Sena. They might just say No. Even though they played the last time, you can never be sure. And you are saying that this is an unconscious decision. It is conscious, that you decide, let's take someone else. But I was very keen. My captain and my coach wanted a certain player but it was unfortunate that he hurt himself. We were very clear...the only player we wanted was Abdul Razzaq.

I think they spoke with him also and then he gave an interview and we spoke with him. There are rules that you can't buy him out of auction. So, he was brought into the auction...he hurt himself and he went away and we couldn't take him, so we took the next best choice...or whatever we felt was the nicest thing to do. I was just trying to explain on Dr. Prannoy Roy's show that it is an issue that people have to consider these things...it's a big business, stakes are high. Just me mentioning that there are these things has resulted in such problems for the last seven days.

Barkha Dutt: But there are people who think you made these nice statements about Pakistan...that there should be neighbourly relations and people-to-people contact should be there. But when it came to the actual bidding, how come you didn't want other than one player. My question to you is, did all these other factors that you've spoken about...the fact there could be complications, stop you?

SRK: There are only personal merit thoughts about each player...the second best choice that we always had was Shane Bond or Roach. I think we wanted a pace bowler...we wanted a top pace bowler who could bowl over 145/143 kind of a thought. That was very clear... I'm giving you the strategy of my team.

Barkha Dutt: That's okay...larger picture.

SRK: Larger picture yeah...so we wanted a pace bowler very clearly. With that we had one player to choose from, we had just one slot so we went for it...and beyond that there was no decision. I hadn't gone for the auction because I was there till 3.30 in the morning...and I had some work for the film. So, I got back and we didn't consider any nationality while deciding the players.

Barkha Dutt: What do you think the others did? Why do you think nobody got picked up?

SRK: I don't know, I can't speak for others but you and I could think it could be because of this. But it would not be right for me to think about it. Because when it had come down to the auction, everyone was a little unfriendly. We were like no no no, we won't tell and everybody would do their own thing. I'm not trying to say that Shah Rukh is saying nice things...but when I'm thinking about it...maybe just logically thinking about it...if I have a problem tomorrow, I would think to myself, lelenge kya yaar phir?

Barkha Dutt: High risk.

SRK: It's a high risk thing and it's unfortunate and if that makes me look like a coward, so be it. But at least I spoke about it. I may not have taken a player, but I spoke about it and I stick to it and I believe in it. I totally believe that anyone who is not related to terrorism or bad deeds from any nation, we cannot club them together...I kept repeating this...then by that logic we should not take anyone from Goa...because there is a Goan gentleman...sorry I should not be saying gentleman, there was a Goan who raped a nine-year-old girl from Russia. If suppose I think that is anti-national...if I think that you have raped a nine-year-old little girl and that it is hugely anti-national...that we should not have anyone from Goa also.

Barkha Dutt: Or Australia.

SRK: Or Australia...so if things like this are going to be, then how are we not looking at ourselves...haven't we done some corporate crimes all over the world? So does that mean all Indians are corporate cheats? There have been bad guys, I don't know about the London bombing? There was one person who got burnt, if I'm not mistaken? And his brother was in Australia and some SIM card thing happened but he was in it. So all Indians are terrorists?

Barkha Dutt: The Glasgow bombing, Yes.

SRK: And it is amazingly ironic because maybe I am brown...and maybe my name is Khan, so in America I would be treated like this anyway so that sort of irks me a bit. I followed the rule but yeah it irks me a bit that arre yaar yahan pe yey problem ho gaya...suddenly I'm clubbed as part of a group. I'm part of that group, I'm sure all of Indians are clubbed in that group when we travel abroad and we don't like it. So how come we don't mind them...

Barkha Dutt: So the least we can do is not label other people?

SRK: We should not label because we don't like the label...I've been frisked, I've been stopped at airports. It's not a big issue but na ho to better hai...instead of having to do all this...there are two ways to look at it: oh mere saath hota hai, mai sab ke saath karunga, but I don't think that's very mature. I don't think it's logical and I don't think it's democratic.




What SRK said was, “If I was not in such a vulnerable position of being a movie star, I am going to show power. I am a thinking bloody Indian. I will show power then.” Why has NDTV headlined it as, "I am a bloody good Indian"? One secular individual (Berkha Dutt) trying to save another secular individual's (SRK) arse?

http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/i_am_a_bloody_good_indian_srk.php?page=1

http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/as_a_movie_star_im_vulnerable_srk.php