Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Crime: Jesus shown with a can, Delhi man on the run

24/02/2010

Today’s crime file opens with an unusual case – that of a publisher who put a picture showing Jesus Christ holding a beer can and a cigarette. The Delhi publisher has gone into hiding and is on the run. The file also has the murder of a 48-year-old BARC scientist. In another case, a teenaged girl was driven to depression and suicide as the police refused to complete her passport verification. Read on.
Objectionable picture of Jesus was a human error, says publisher
Shillong/New Delhi: A court in Shillong on Tuesday issued an arrest warrant against Inder Mohan Jha, the Delhi-based director of Skyline Publications, after the police moved a petition seeking his arrest for an objectionable picture of Jesus Christ in a school textbook.
After Chief Judicial Magistrate M Challam issued the warrant, DSP (Crime) Vivek Syiem said he would soon send a team to Delhi to arrest Jha.He said the state police team would team up with the Delhi Police to investigate how the objectionable picture of Jesus -- holding a beer can and a cigarette -- got into the textbook.
The picture had caused an outrage in the Christian-dominated state, after St Joseph Girls Higher Secondary School first detected it in a primary school cursive writing textbook and filed an FIR against the publisher.
Syiem said as of now the focus of investigation will be on the publisher with the printer and distributor of the book coming in later. Skyline had issued a frontpage advertisement on Monday morning apologising for the objectionable depiction of Jesus Christ.
Jha, meanwhile, is on the run. "I apologise for the mistake. I have tendered my apology with a local newspaper in Shillong. It was a human error,"he said.

"I am not in Delhi at the moment; I cannot say when I will be back. I should be back in three-four days," he said, refusing to disclose his current location.
Jha, 40, claims to be the one-man show behind Skyline, which he started "four months back." "It was my first published set of books. I had printed textbooks for classes I to V, and had printed a total of 1,200 copies," he said.
"I distributed 200 books in Shillong in December as the academic session had not started anywhere else," he said, adding that he had not distributed his books in any other state and was on his rounds across the country to do so when the controversy hit.
Jha, who would not give the location of his office, claims to have destroyed all remaining copies of his book. "I had given the job of designing the book to a Delhi-based agency, and they seem to have lifted an offensive photo off the Internet," he claimed, again refusing to share the name of his designer. He said that he would initiate legal action against his designer once he returns to the city, but expressed ignorance of any case registered against him.
Ranjith Singh of Students' BookStall, Shillong, which distributed about 120 copies of the book, said Jha had approached him in "November or December." "We stock so many publishers because most offer attractive discounts.
We cannot be expected to be so certain about their antecedents. It is up to the school to approve the book after receiving the sample copies," he added.
1-1 of 1
PreviousNext
K.Venugopal
#1
24 February 2010 11:01:09
It is no doubt objectionable to depict Jesus in a manner that goes against what he stood for. Showing him with a can of beer and a cigarette, a typical pose of today's restless youngsters, would be tantamount to glorifying the very culture that Jesus would have campaigned against were he to be amongst us today. However, I wonder why the secular press is not speaking up for the publisher as they spoke up for M.F.Hussain when he depicted Saraswati nude. Secular double standards where Christian sentiments are considered valid and Hindu sentiments are up for a toss?

http://news.in.msn.com/crimefile/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3646728&ucid=300866#uc2Lst300866

FBI shares details on Headley's recces across India

NDTV Correspondent, Wednesday February 24, 2010, New Delhi

The FBI has reportedly shared fresh information with India on terror suspect David Headley and his links to the Pune blast. The FBI has also given details about new sites recced by Headley.

It is confirmed that Headley recced targets in Pune. Headley also recced the Raksha Bhavan in Delhi.

The government had earlier claimed that there was a clear link between the Pune attack and David Coleman Headley, who is in a Chicago jail after being arrested by the FBI in September.

Headley's charges in the US include working as an operative of the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) to plan and execute 26/11.

At the moment we should not be too bothered by Headley. He is in prison and not in a position to plan any future terror attacks. Why are we not able to catch those who planted the bombs in Pune? There are on the loose.

http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/fbi_shares_details_on_headleys_recces_across_india.php

Friday, February 19, 2010

What is your problem, Khan asks Bal Thackeray

19/02/2010

A defiant Shah Rukh Khan has again refused to bow down to Shiv Sena and says he fails to comprehend the logic behind the controversy. The Bollywood icon also said that he was hurt by questions that hovered around his Indian-ness.

Mumbai: Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan, who drew Shiv Sena's ire for supporting the inclusion of Pakistani cricketers in the IPL, says he does not understand the "logic" behind the controversy and would have apologised if they had a problem with his film 'My Name Is Khan'.
The 44-year-old superstar said what hurt him most was the fact that his "Indian-ness" was questioned again and again.
Khan said that he would have apologised to Shiv Sena if the content of his film, released on February 12, was found to be offensive but did not do so because he didn't understand the "logic" behind their anger.
"If they had a problem with my film, I would have apologised. I have done so earlier because I do not want to offend anyone with my films, my aim is to entertain. But this was about who I am as a person and my Indianness and I was hurt that I had to clarify it again and again," said Khan in an interaction with a TV channel.

The actor said that he has "great respect" for the Sena leaders but feels that politics and patriotism should not have been mixed with entertainment.
"They are much older than me and I have great respect for them. But I did not understand why was the film dragged in between. I am one of those who believe that entertainment and politics should not be mixed," he said.
"I did not understand why was my Indian-ness questioned. My father is a freedom fighter and I am proud of that," he added
Source: Agencies
K.Venugopal
#1
19 February 2010 15:11:13
SRK's request that patriotism should not be mixed with entertainment is not valid. There cannot be any entertainment that is anti-national. Shiv Sena at no time said there was anything unpatriotic about the film MNIK. Maybe they linked SRK's Pakistani comments about IPL rather unfairly. But Shiv Sena was well within its rights to protest against SRK's perceived soft corner for Pakistan at a time when Pakistan is hell-bent on causing trouble in India. When you support the enemy, you are certainly unpatriotic. But whether this applies to SRK is a moot question. I would like to think his Pakistani comments were rather philosophical but Shiv Sena saw it otherwise. Their democratic right.

http://news.in.msn.com/international/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3639569&page=0&ucid=298683#uc2Lst298683

Sunday, February 14, 2010

Politicisation of fight against terror anti-national: Cong


Updated on Sunday, February 14, 2010, 21:08 IST Tags:Fight against terror, Politicisation anti-national, Cong

New Delhi: Without naming BJP and Shiv Sena, Congress today stepped up its attacks on the two parties for their remarks over the Pune blast, saying any politicisation or communalisation of the fight against terror is anti-national.

"It is imprudent, inadvisable and irresponsible to second-guess an investigation and arrive at pre-determined conclusion by jumping the gun," party spokesperson Manish Tiwari said when asked to comment on BJP's remark on the incident.


When asked how does the party view the main opposition party's reaction following the Pune blast, he said, "Any politicisation or communalisation of the fight against terror is definitely anti-national."

The Congress' reaction came after BJP opposed the recent initiative to resume the Indo-Pak composite dialogue and Shiv Sena's attack on the Maharashtra government after yesterday's blast.

BJP's leader of opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitely criticised the UPA Government for not taking "the nation, Parliament or even the Congress" into confidence before deciding on resumption of the dialogue.

He said as long as the terror infrastructure in Pakistan is not dismantled and Pakistan does not stop sponsoring terror from its soil, the composite dialogue should not resume.

The Congress leader also said, "Let the investigation fructify ... if any inferences need to be drawn, we are confident that the government would factor them in and arrive at the appropriate decision."

To a question whether the blast will have any impact on the resumption of Indo-Pak dialogue, he said, "That is for the government to take decision."

Earlier, reacting to attacks on his party by BJP and Shiv Sena, party spokesperson Shakeel Ahmed said "unfortunately, a few political parties are trying to extract political mileage out of this unfortunate incident".

PTI


Pakistan seems to be having the best of both worlds - seeking all measures to weaken India by encouraging cross-border terrorism while wanting to hold talks with India so that it can flaunt its credentials as a peace loving nation. BJP's call for calling-off the talks makes eminent sense. Calling BJP stand political or communal only reveals UPA Government's own agenda of appeasing its Muslim vote bank.

http://www.zeenews.com/news604085.html

Shah Rukh plays safe post Pune blasts?

14 Feb, 2010 05:00 pm IST l INDIATIMES MOVIES

Just when we thought the Sena-SRK controversy is dying down and things are getting better, the national media found yet another big story to flash onscreen 24/7- the Pune blast.

Shah Rukh Khan’s film, 'My Name is Khan' which faced huge flak from the Sena before its release is now running to packed houses all across the globe with SRK getting accolades for promoting peace through his film. The actor’s Berlin visit was successful, too. Shah Rukh was supposed to address the press in Mumbai on Sunday for the first time post his film’s controversial release but eventually cancelled the meet.

“Mumbai is on red alert post the Pune blast and considering the ongoing tension brewing between SRK and Sena, SRK must have decided to stay out due to security reasons,” revealed a source.

It can be remembered that SRK was of the view that peace should prevail between India and Pakistan and was also keen to have Pakistani cricketers in his IPL team. However, given the sensitive circumstances post the Pune blast, quaestions regarding 'friendship' between the two countries are bound to be hurled at him. Our source said, "If any terrorist group operating from Pakistan is found involved in the Pune blast, it would be difficult for Shah Rukh to then face questions from the media on his views..."

Having had his fair share of controversy in the last month, it seems like SRK is choosing to play safe this time around, and staying away from controversial waters.


The message of SRK's film MNIK appears to be that not all Muslims are terrorists. The point is, are not the number of Muslims who are terrorists enough to validate the general charge that Muslims tend to be terrorists or, at least, given the fact that terrorism in India has links to Pakistan, that Pakistan is behind terrorism in India? This being so and proved again and again, we should prepare for war and not peace with Pakistan.

http://movies.indiatimes.com/News/Shah-Rukh-plays-safe-post-Pune-blasts/articleshow/5572868.cms

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Senior BSF officer suspended over Kashmir teen's killing


Updated on Saturday, February 13, 2010, 13:55 IST Tags:Kashmir, BSF officer, Teenager`s killing

Srinagar: A senior Border Security Force (BSF) officer in Jammu and Kashmir was suspended on Saturday and a court of inquiry ordered after allegations that the fatal shooting of a 17-year-old boy at Nishat on February 5 took place on his orders.

Commanding officer (CO) of the 68 battalion, RK Birdi has been suspended, said an official source.

The suspension follows a statement by an arrested BSF trooper Lakhwinder Kumar that he had fired at the teenager on Birdi's orders. Kumar was suspended by the BSF following an in-house enquiry which found him involved in the shooting of Zahid Farooq Sheikh.


During questioning Kumar revealed that he had only followed the orders of his boss and fired three bullets from his automatic rifle, one of which hit Zahid on the chest. The teenager died while being taken to hospital.

The sources said Kumar told police officers questioning him that he had no option but to fire as he was under the orders of his CO.

Zahid's father had earlier challenged the version of the BSF and said it was the CO who had fired at the group of youths on that fateful afternoon.

Quoting an eyewitness, Farooq Ahmad Sheikh, father of Zahid, said that the CO of the BSF had snatched the rifle from a trooper and fired at his son.


BSF authorities have moved Birdi to Srinagar from his present posting on the Line of Control for questioning.

The state government has also set up a time bound enquiry headed by the Kashmir divisional commissioner which is likely to submit its report next week.

IANS


I think the question that arises from the above report is what was the "group of youths" doing which led to the firing?

http://www.zeenews.com/news603789.html

Friday, February 12, 2010

US-Muslim body issues fatwa against airport body scanners


Updated on Friday, February 12, 2010, 13:05 IST Tags:US, Muslim, fatwa, airport, scanners

Washington: Some Muslim-American groups are supporting a fatwa issued by a body of Islamic scholars forbidding Muslims from going through full body scanners at airports, a media report said.

The Fiqh Council of North America issued the religious ruling this week that says going through the airport scanners would violate Islamic rules on modesty, Free Press reported.

It is a violation of clear Islamic teachings that men or women be seen naked by other men and women," reads the fatwa issued Tuesday. "Islam highly emphasises haya (modesty) and considers it part of faith. The Quran has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts."

After the Christmas Day bombing attempt in Detroit by a Muslim suspect from Nigeria, some US airports are now in the process of buying and using the body scanners to find explosives and other dangerous materials carried by terrorists.

But Muslim groups say the scanners, which show in graphic detail the outlines of a person's body, go against their religion. One option offered to passengers who don't want to use the scanners would be a pat down by a security guard. The Muslim groups are urging members to undergo those instead.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) says it endorses the fatwa. "We support the Fiqh Council's statement on full-body scanners and believe that the religious and privacy rights of passengers can be respected while maintaining safety and security," Nihad Awad, national executive director of CAIR was quoted as saying.

Currently, there are 40 full-body scanners at 19 airports in the US, including two in Detroit, said spokesman Jim Fotenos of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). There are plans for 450 more body scanners in US airports, he said.

In a statement, the TSA said it is committed to keeping passengers safe and also protecting their privacy.

"TSA's mission is to keep the travelling public safe. Advanced imaging technologies are an important tool in a multi-layered security system to detect evolving threats such as improvised explosive devices.

"TSA's use of these technologies includes strong protections in place to safeguard passenger privacy. Screening images are automatically deleted, and the officer viewing the image will never see the passenger."

The TSA stressed that the body scanners are "optional to all passengers". Those who turn them down, "will receive equivalent screening that may include a physical pat-down, hand-wanding, and other technologies".


"Physical pat-downs are performed by Transportation Security Officers of the same sex as the passenger in a private screening area, if the passenger requests."

Body scanners "do not produce photos", the agency said. Rather, the images "look like chalk outlines".

IANS


Scanners at airports have become vital in the light of airborne terrorism. The Mullahs are simply superimposing 7th century moralistic ideas out of context and proving themselves to be mere pests and even supporters of terrorism. -K.Venugopal - Mumbai