Saturday, March 6, 2010

Babbar Khalsa threatens to attack Himachal temples

Updated on Sunday, March 07, 2010, 09:49 IST Tags:Babbar Khalsa, Navratra festival, Terror attack

Zeenews Bureau

New Delhi: Sikh terror group Babbar Khalsa has threatened to attack most prominent temples in Himachal Pradesh during the Navaratra festival.

The threat, issued in the name of the group, was received by the Additional Director General of CID.


The letter threatened to hit religious places such as Naina Devi, Brajeshwari Devi temple, Chamunda Devi, Kangra, Jawalamukhi temple.

Meanwhile, the security officials are examining the letter. The security has already been tightened as the auspicious Hindu festival starts next week.



Lakhs of devotees visit these temples during this festive season.

Last month, intelligence agencies had warned of Laskhar-e-Toiba and Babbar Khalsa International joining hands and planning terror attacks across India.


Babbar Khalsa is no doubt hooked to the Islamic terrorists in Pakistan and Pakistan government is encouraging the terrorists while putting up a face of peace. The short-sighted Indian government has fallen for it and has engaged them in talks to make them respectable in the eyes of America. Unless we declare Pakistan a terrorist state and prepare to wage war against it, our problems are only going to keep compounding.

http://www.zeenews.com/news609202.html

HAILY NITHY. HE IS BACK IN ACTION.

March 5th, 2010 8 Comments Posted in Great Hindu
Nithy is going to be back soon. For the time being, he has accused some inmates of video-morphing and he has also tried to legally restrain SUN TV from airing the defamatory video. He is expected to give a video message today. Meanwhile people are moving out of his ashram… as confusion reigns supreme. The next court hearing is on March 8th.
8 Responses to “HAILY NITHY. HE IS BACK IN ACTION.”
1. 1
Vijayalakshmi Says:
March 5th, 2010 at 3:45 pm
Yes, he must file a defamation suit against Sun TV, and see that his name is cleared. The culprits who are responsible for the fake video and its airing/publicity must be punished as per the law of the land. The damage done to his reputation and the properties of his ashram must be adequately compensated.
2. 2
Devi Says:
March 5th, 2010 at 5:36 pm
If he is really a good person, he would have came clear before the poeple and tell the truth.
He didn’t do that, so he definately involved such scandal.
Dont fool the people again and again in the name of GOD
3. 3
Vinagayamoorthi Says:
March 5th, 2010 at 5:39 pm
He will not come back, he made our religion name got collapsed.
Such people has to be sentenced.
4. 4
Tag Pillay Says:
March 5th, 2010 at 9:49 pm
How do we know that Kripalu Maharaj and Nithia were a victim of the alliance of the Cia/Kgb/Vatican/M16. This could be a perfect sting operation as both Kripalu Maharaj and Nithia were drawing huge crowds. On the other hand, a Swami is a Swami when a Swami has banished reproductive activities.
5. 5
venugopal Says:
March 6th, 2010 at 12:31 pm
Well he’s no saint…..that’s for sure…just like u and me…..always remember…its “kalavuga days”….wonder what he preaches…hmmmmm
6. 6
karthik sunder Says:
March 6th, 2010 at 12:32 pm
kunju enthirakathavanuku ranjitha kekuthaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!
7. 7
krutika Says:
March 6th, 2010 at 12:35 pm
If you believe these sanyasis one is going to get mad 4 sure.
Unless we introspect rather than blame others for our fault this is gonna continue for ever.
8. 8
K.Venugopal Says:
March 6th, 2010 at 8:59 pm
Phoney video?
It does not appear to be a genuine video. It does not seem to be caught by hidden CCTV but appears to be produced with look-alikes and a directed camera. A sting operation would have intended to catch the swami in the act of sexual intercourse. But the light was conveniently switched off. Was the plot to show minimal of swami’s body because anything more and the look alike would have been compromised? Also, why no audio? Is it because the actor could not mimic the swami’s voice?

http://greathindu.com/2010/03/hail-nithy-he-is-back-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-34356

Friday, March 5, 2010

Definitions of 'had sex' not consistent

05/03/2010

If someone says he or she "had sex," one can't really define what exactly transpired, because there is no uniform consensus on what it exactly means, a new study found.

The study from the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University found that no uniform consensus existed when a representative sample of 18- to 96-year-olds was asked what the term meant to them.
Around 30 percent of the study participants did not consider oral sex as sex, while for 20 per cent of the participants anal sex was not sex either.
A surprising number of older men did not consider penile-vaginal intercourse to be sex.
More than idle gossip, the answers to questions about sex can inform - or misinform - research, medical advice and health education efforts.
"Researchers, doctors, parents, sex educators should all be very careful and not assume that their own definition of sex is shared by the person they're talking to, be it a patient, a student, a child or study participant," said Brandon Hill, research associate at the Kinsey Institute.


The study, conducted in conjunction with the Rural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention in IU's School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, delves deeper into a question first examined in 1999 - in the midst of a presidential sex scandal where the definition of sex was an issue.
Researchers from The Kinsey Institute asked college students what "had sex" meant to them, taking the approach, which was unique then, of polling the students on specific behaviours. No consensus was found then, either.
The new study examined whether more information helped clarify matters- study participants were asked about specific sexual behaviors and such qualifiers as whether orgasm was reached-and researchers also wanted to involve a more representative audience, not just college students.
"Throwing the net wider, with a more representative sample, only made it more confusing and complicated. People were even less consistent across the board," said Hill.
The study involved responses from 486 Indiana residents who took part in a telephone survey conducted by the Center for Survey Research at IU.


Participants, mostly heterosexual, were asked, "Would you say you ''had sex'' with someone if the most intimate behaviour you engaged in was ...," followed by 14 behaviourally specific items.
Responses did not differ significantly overall for men and women. The study involved 204 men and 282 women.
95 percent of respondents would consider penile-vaginal intercourse (PVI) having had sex, but this rate drops to 89 per cent if there is no ejaculation.
81 percent considered penile-anal intercourse having had sex, with the rate dropping to 77 percent for men in the youngest age group (18-29), 50 percent for men in the oldest age group (65 and up) and 67 percent for women in the oldest age group.
71 per cent and 73 per cent considered oral contact with a partner's genitals (OG), either performing or receiving, as having had sex.
Men in the youngest and oldest age groups were less likely to answer "yes" compared with the middle two age groups for when they performed OG.
Significantly fewer men in the oldest age group answered "yes" for PVI (77 per cent).
Source: Indian Express
1-1 of 1
K.Venugopal
#1
06 March 2010 10:18:22
Sex could be defined as the act of genital arousal.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Why ‘Infidel’?
 A salacious tape containing alleged sexual acts of godman Nithyananda Paramahamsa, telecast by a Tamil TV

Posted by muslimmalaysia786 on March 4, 2010

Protest over Swami Nithyananda’s alleged sex video
CHENNAI/BANGALORE: A salacious tape containing alleged sexual acts of godman Nithyananda Paramahamsa, telecast by a Tamil TV channel repeatedly since Tuesday night, triggered violence across Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, with disciples in his ashrams located in the two states being roughed up and his property damaged by the irate public.
The tape, aired by the channel, shows a man, similar in appearance to the young long-haired godman, in a few minutes of sexual romp allegedly with a Tamil actor. The incident also evoked a sharp response from Tamil Nadu CM M Karunanidhi. When asked in Tiruchi about the alleged sexual excesses by the godmen, the CM said a meeting of a high-level committee comprising members of the state-run Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment department and other top officials would be convened to discuss and decide on the course of action the government planned to take to curb the trend.
Nithyananda made a vain bid late in the evening to restrain the media from airing the tape, but a city civil court did not grant any stay, as sought by the godman, but merely ordered notices to some news organisations. In his petition, he claimed that the video footage was a fake and morphed one. He blamed an inmate of his ashram, Premananda alias Lenin Karuppan, for the morphing of his face with the idea of defaming him. The petition has been posted to March 8 for further hearing. The godman said he had 45 lakh devotees in 17 countries and was involved in social work and education besides spiritual activities.
In Chennai, a group of advocates lodged a complaint against the godman at the police commissionerate, seeking criminal action against him. Alleging that he had amassed wealth worth several crores of rupees, they demanded that the government confiscate his properties and freeze his accounts. In Coimbatore, the godman’s posters were ripped off the street walls and staff in a yoga centre run by his devotees fled fearing an attack.
Reacting to the defamatory video, a statement from the Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam at Bidadi in Karnataka said: ‘‘A mix of conspiracy, graphics and rumour are at play in these recent events that have unfolded. We are working on a legal course of action and will come up with updates in due course.”
An uneasy calm prevailed around the 14-acre ashram at Dasanakoppalu, near Bidadi, in the suburbs of Bangalore. Police cordoned off the ashram premises to prevent the public from creating trouble.
MUSLIMS AND LITERATURE


BY 
DILARA HAFIZ, MARCH 3, 2010

“Who here has read Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s book Infidel?” For the first time in three years, not a single person raised their hand. At book club meetings, church gatherings, women’s groups, and Islamic presentations across this country, countless hands usually shoot up in the air in response to my question. My predominantly non-Muslim American audiences love to embrace Hirsi Ali’s experiences as applicable to Muslim women the world over. Why are they so quick to believe one ex-Muslim woman’s autobiographical tale?


Is it because she denounces Islam as ‘barbaric, backward, and bigoted’ – all traits which resonate with people unfamiliar with Islam? If people are truly curious about Islam, then why aren’t books by practicing Muslim women flying off the shelves – books like Why I Am A Muslim by Asma Gul Hassan, War on Error by Melody Moezzi, or Living Islam Out Loud by Saleemah Abdul Gafur?
My sneaking suspicion is that people are willing to believe the worst about Islam because they can then justify the public airing of their private intolerance – they are given free rein to voice their misconceptions, smug with complacency that anything they read in print must be true, especially when it’s spreading poisonous hatred about Islam. This willful ignorance seems particular to the topic of Islam because, funnily enough, books like In the Shadow of the Cross: The True Account of My Childhood Sexual and Ritual Abuse at the Hands of a Roman Catholic Priest by Charles L. Bailey Jr. or Sex, Lies, and Rabbis: Breaking a Sacred Trust by Charlotte Schwab didn’t seem to garner either the public’s interest or the media’s attention. According to Amazon’s Sales Rankings, Bailey’s book, released January 2007, just one month prior to Hirsi Ali’s book, presently comes in at 566,088. Schwab’s book languishes at 2,173,819 sales rank seven years after publication. Infidel is ranked 1,386.
I’m troubled by this disconnect. True, Amazon’s sales rankings certainly aren’t the definitive word on America’s book buying habits, but as a useful barometer of mainstream popularity, I do find these statistics to expose an undercurrent of Islamophobia/Islam Allergy. In these uncertain times people seem willing to believe the very worst of their neighbors, and are all too eager for propaganda books like Infidel which offer a politically correct outlet for their otherwise concealed bigotry. Hating Islam outright isn’t socially acceptable (yet), but if it is done in the name of women’s liberation or equal education, one goes from a lowly bigot to a lofty crusader for social change. This disturbing media trend gives people license to maintain hateful views about other people, all under the convenient guise of justice.
Regardless of the many intelligent, reasonable Muslims who strive in word and deed to prove their essential humanity, the masses seem to be massing, restless to blame the ‘other.’ When the hushed whispers of hatred become a drumbeat across this country, it’ll be too late to turn the tide. We need to redouble our efforts, whether they be interfaith dialogue, community service, public service, media, the arts, education, sports – speak up to define Islam! You don’t need to be a religious scholar; after all, Hirsi Ali acknowledges her total ignorance about Islamic principles but her admission didn’t give millions of people pause when they accepted her pronouncements as coming from the voice of an authority. This article is not an incitement for proselytizing, but rather a plea for us to open our eyes to the damage one woman has single-handedly done to the understanding of Islam. It’s up to us to painstakingly suture this gaping wound before American Muslims find their wellbeing as citizens of this country irreparably damaged.
As co-author of The American Muslim Teenager’s Handbook, my son, Imran, jokes with me that he could have sold ten times the number of books if he had written a book titled Rebellion: One Boy’s Escape From The Tyrannical Clutches of Islam. Sad…but true. It is far easier it is to believe the worst about a group when you simply don’t know them.
In case you’re curious about the last presentation – we were speaking to a progressive Jewish reconstructionist group. It seems one religious minority had no interest in reading the narrow-minded ravings of a person out to slander another religious minority. Thank you, Kadima – you made my day and gave me hope that there are others out there who are willing to suspend judgment until they’ve actually met a Muslim.
(Photo: Mutasim Billah Pritam)


This entry was posted on March 4, 2010 at 5:57 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
No Responses Yet to “Why ‘Infidel’?
 A salacious tape containing alleged sexual acts of godman Nithyananda Paramahamsa, telecast by a Tamil TV”
1.
K.Venugopal said
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
March 4, 2010 at 6:31 pm
The video showing Swami in compromising acts is not genuine because:
1. At one point the Swamiji (look alike) sports moustache.
2. From some angles the look-alike does not look like Swami.
3. If it was a sting operation to expose the Swami, and the actress was part of the plot, why was the light switched off at the crucial moment? The whole purpose of the sting operation would have been to expose the Swamiji in the act of sexual intercourse. Why was this act not videographed? Because videographing the sexual act would have exposed Swami’s full body and it would have become clear that it was not the Swami? It seems that the plan was to show as little of the Swami’s body as possible so that the look-alike was not exposed.
4. If the sting operation was carried out without the knowledge of the actress, the movement of the actress sliding up the Swamiji to get water and swami’s reaction looks contrived. This indicates that both the Swami and the actress roles were played by look-alikes.
5. Two different girls were involved on two different days, which appears to have been previous night and following morning. A fixed CCTV video would have shown the two girls simultaneously. This proves the videography was carried out with look-alikes who were suitably directed – not by a fixed CCTV from a hidden place.
6. It appears that the Swami got up the second day in the morning, because his yawn is a give away. Then why was the light switched off after some point even in the morning? This also proves that the characters involved are all look-alikes.
7. Why is the Swami looking so intently at the TV even when the actress was massaging his legs and more? Apparently he was waiting for his cue from the director to begin playing the part. If it was the Swami, the reaction to the actress massaging him would have looked natural.
8. If technology to produce a clear video was used, why was the conversation not caught? Because the look-alikes could not imitate the true voices?
Reply

http://muslimmalaysia786.wordpress.com/2010/03/04/why-%e2%80%98infidel%e2%80%99%e2%80%a8-a-salacious-tape-containing-alleged-sexual-acts-of-godman-nithyananda-paramahamsa-telecast-by-a-tamil-tv/#comment-56



http://themalaysiantribune-taxidriver.blogspot.com/2010/03/why-infidel-salacious-tape-containing.html?showComment=1267727843429_AIe9_BFB-gqo8LCEoM8l_Fzm67_4mT8XrV8tN_5qU1lujAJj7GbTTlGkZC2cdhPwK69QNPIet_TB4OO5nMAstWtdAG7pciyDay5WytSg1bjsd5jAJqh_IQBNTIda-JPA2Z_MaVOv24hRiwoBJPQQkc4rsqk2ZeQIhFUhbsIkZjJiCfPyt0njQyxhvnC3a5N0y0hRq7Xnz9gKsImkpyYE7YNrM2hzIvv5QqMSGmvaYzwouktCctkEzrNxXjb1cHsQ2EEQCgTf0kUoXQnWe_VAP7-wxcpSXXsMig#c2544682027608246198



http://www.123breakingnews.com/scandal-of-swami-nityananda-61202-123/comment-page-1#comment-13209



This is not a genuine video. Why light switched off? Sting operation would have meant catching Swami in act of sexual intercourse. Why no audio? Because the actors could not mimic Swamiji's voice? Minimal show of Swami's body because the look alike did not want to compromise himself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ks97eYaTD4



It does not appear to be a genuine video. It does not seem to be caught by hidden CCTV but appears to be produced with look-alikes and a directed camera. A sting operation would have intended to catch the swami in the act of sexual intercourse. But the light was conveniently switched off. Was the plot to show minimal of swami's body because anything more and the look alike would have been compromised? Also, why no audio? Is it because the actor could not mimic the swami's voice?
[Posted in Haindava Keralam.]

Lawyers want swami behind bars


Express News Service
First Published : 04 Mar 2010 03:57:00 AM IST
Last Updated : 04 Mar 2010 06:37:50 AM IST

CHENNAI: Even as telecast of the footage showing godman Nithyananda’s sexcapade with a film actress continued, a group of advocates from Madras High Court on Thursday lodged a complaint with the city police commissioner seeking criminal action against him on grounds of obscenity.
“Godman Nithyananda’s conduct brought disgrace to Tamil culture,” advocate R Siva Sankar told reporters after submitting their complaint.
“In the disguise of a saint, Nithyananda cheated the people for his own materialistic gains,” said advocate S Rajinikanth.
“Now, it is clearly proved to the public that Nithyananda had amassed wealth acting as a godman,” he added.
Rajnikanth further said the government should confiscate all the properties owned by him or his ashram.
When asked how they related this shame to Tamil culture, advocate Siva Sankar said it was similar to actress Kushboo’s remarks on premarital affairs that were objected to strongly.
Meanwhile, R Kumararaja, state president of Shiva Sena, extended his support to Nithyananda and said that the pictures and videos were morphed.
“The forces acting against Hindu religion have created a conspiracy to malign Hindu personalities like Nithyananada,” he said.
However, there was no reaction from the public in Chennai to the entire episode. But, on the other hand, Hindu Makkal Katchi activists in various parts of the state staged protests and condemned the godman’s act.

Comments
The video showing Swami in compromising acts is not genuine because: 1. At one point the Swamiji (look alike) sports moustache. 2. From some angles the look-alike does not look like Swami. 3. If it was a sting operation to expose the Swami, and the actress was part of the plot, why was the light switched off at the crucial moment? The whole purpose of the sting operation would have been to expose the Swamiji in the act of sexual intercourse. Why was this act not videographed? Because videographing the sexual act would have exposed Swami’s full body and it would have become clear that it was not the Swami? It seems that the plan was to show as little of the Swami’s body as possible so that the look-alike was not exposed. 4. If the sting operation was carried out without the knowledge of the actress, the movement of the actress sliding up the Swamiji to get water and swami's reaction looks contrived. This indicates that both the Swami and the actress roles were played by look-alikes.
By K.Venugopal
3/4/2010 10:53:00 PM
5. Two different girls were involved on two different days, which appears to have been previous night and following morning. A fixed CCTV video would have shown the two girls simultaneously. This proves the videography was carried out with look-alikes who were suitably directed – not by a fixed CCTV from a hidden place. 6. It appears that the Swami got up the second day in the morning, because his yawn is a give away. Then why was the light switched off after some point even in the morning? This also proves that the characters involved are all look-alikes. 7. Why is the Swami looking so intently at the TV even when the actress was massaging his legs and more? Apparently he was waiting for his cue from the director to begin playing the part. If it was the Swami, the reaction to the actress massaging him would have looked natural. 8. If technology to produce a clear video was used, why was the conversation not caught? Because the look-alikes could not imitate the true voices?
By K.Venugopal
3/4/2010 10:55:00 PM



Well Done,K.Venugopal.All Hindus and ALL patriotic indians must know their real enemies, the followers of hate filled semitic religions, islam amd christianity.Read indian and world history of last 2000 years and you will see that the above hate filed semitic religions have done genocide of more than 100 million hindus,sukhs, buddhists,etc accusing them as infidel kafirs and demolished more than 3000 temples to get heavn after death with virgins and wine as GIFTS are preached by their terror maunals Quran and Bible. For peace to prevail the terror books Quran and Bible must be banned and ONLY truly SECULAR religions like hindusims,sikhism,buddhism ecxt which respect all human beings and all religions as equal MUST be allowed in our secular country and if possible in the world
By Real Patriot
3/5/2010 12:37:00 AM

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

It was nitya ananda at swami's ashram


Courtesy: Deccan Herald
Bangalore/Chennai March 3: The video flicks showing a saffron-clad man with flowing, dark manes spread-eagled on a bed canoodling with women is bad karma for the swamiji alleged to be the 33-year-old Paramahansa Nityananda.
In his sprawling 25-acre ashram, 35 kilometres south-west of Bangalore in Kalluguppahalli in Bidadi taluk of Ramanagara district, off Mysore Road, Nityananda's press coordinator Nitya Sachidananda does not see hedonism and spirituality militate against each other. At the Nityananda Dhyanapeetam, Indian ascetism has been clearly, cleverly and conveniently redefined.
"The Swamiji has permitted his disciples at Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam to pursue both hedonism and spiritualism because he believes they should live intensely," the 45-year-old Sachidananda, who claims to have lived and worked as a scientist in the United States, told Deccan Herald.
Sachidananda, who hails from Andhra Pradesh, met Nityananda in Chicago in 2003 when the self-proclaimed swamiji established his order at the age of 26. He was instantly taken in by what he described as Nityananda's "quantum spirituality", a concept which Sachidananda thinks he understood and grasped well, but could not shed much light on. The "truth" and "enlightenment" Sachidananda experienced were passed on to him by Nityananda whose educational attainments are as obscure as his origins in Thiruvannamalai in Tamil Nadu.
Some of Nityananda's disciples, attired in white kurta and dhoti, with saffron "angavastram" wrapped around their necks, milled around the ashram's dusty, rocky and ragged terrain, fear and confusion writ large on their faces.
One of these disciples, who was clearly uncomfortable in disclosing his identity, said such was the power of Nityananda's teachings over him that he had not just discovered "truth" but had even felt and experienced it. "Truth is something that cannot be defined. I cannot express it in words," the disciple said fumbling for the right words, searching for the right expression.
There were scores of women, some of them attired in cream sarees with golden borders, identical to the one a woman is draped in one of the videos.
The very sight of newsmen entering the main complex of the ashram where the living quarters, an apology for a "charitable dispensary", the library, the Nityananda Gurukula and some other half-constructed buildings are located, made them scamper inside two rooms.
It appeared they were under express instructions not to venture out in the open. Only the young men hung out in groups.
Some clutched their laptops to their chests, others worked on their machines, or perhaps made a show of it, and yet others whispered into their cell phones. Like their spiritual guru, most of the young men sported long hair, some let the rebounded hair down and others had their locks tied in ponytails.
One disciple, Deepak, who had close cropped hair, claimed he was 21-years-old and had a law degree from Bangalore University. But Deepak could not explain how he finished a five-year degree course in three. All he did say was he was an "ashramite" before he was asked to shut up.
Like Deepak there are others, including young women from affluent families, who have given up education and quit well-paid jobs to find peace at Nityananda Dhyanapeetam where local village folks' entry is barred.
Others have left their wives and children behind. They have believed — hook, line and sinker — every word Nityananda wanted them to believe. Ramanagara deputy superintendent of police D Devaraj told Deccan Herald that Nityananda told his flock that the banyan tree in the asharam was 600 years old. "And they believe it," the officer said.
In a Buddha-like act, it is that banyan tree under which Nityananda sits to meditate and "awakens" his minions for whom initiation to the order follows three simple steps: "listen" to the Paramahansa Nityananda, hear his "awakening talks everyday" and wear 'mala' "energised by the Master". They also pray and worship the Shiva phallus.
Disciples frustrated
While fear of the unknown stalks the disciples, especially because their beloved swamiji was absent since he was at the Kumbh mela, as Sachidananda claimed, some visitors from Chennai felt frustrated with the fuss over the sex videos allegedly featuring Nityananda.
"Indian history is replete with instances of many holymen having had to go through the same process," said a defensive N Balasubramanian, who first met Nityananda in Chicago and was attracted by his discourses.
Devotees ransack ashram in TN
Enraged devotees of Swami Paramahansa Nityananda, caught on tape making love to a Tamil film actress on Wednesday, broke loose in different parts of Tamil Nadu ransacking his ashram, reports DHNS from Chennai.
Sex, lies and videotape
The 'sex to super-consciousness' idea that Osho Rajneesh sought to popularise and subtly legitimize since the early 1970s' first from his Pune 'ashram', seems to be an unbundling train on its tracks.
The latest 'sex scandal' involving a Tamil Nadu born self-styled Godman, Rajasekharan, a handsome youth with a winsome smile who turned into Swami Paramahams Nityananda, and a Tamil film-star Ranjitha, is not uncommon here, where sex and spirituality have had a dubious run.
Though born in Thiruvannamalai, known for its shrine of Arunachala Shiva and the world-renowned centre of spiritualism, founded by Ramana Maharshi, whose spiritual journey had marked him out in the true Indian tradition of self-enquiry, Nityananda, analysts say, was the manifest of a libertine side of a self-made 'Guru', whose out-of-the box, syrupy spirituality won him a large following.
Nityananda's captivating smile and attractive demeanor in his ochre robes, is easily marketable in an age when an upwardly mobile Indian middle class looks to refreshing interpretations of India's spiritual tradition, laced with catchy tips for self-improvement, analysts add. A large number of women looked up to him as an "icon of positive energy".
He has a large fan-following in the US too, the Tamil diaspora in particular. Nityananda tried to build a 'grand ashram' at his native Tiruvannamalai, but could not as the Supreme Court had banned construction of any permanent structure along the 'Giri valam' (path-way around the sacred mountain), a source there said. But the Godman's large fan following ensured a bigger 'Ashram' in Bangalore, where the sting operation of his sexual intimacies probably took place, the source added.
Tamil Nadu has witnessed a couple of big spiritual anti-climaxes in the recent past. Premkumar, a Sri Lankan Tamil who styled himself as Swami Premananda and set up an 'Ashram' in Tiruchirappalli, managed to lure many girls, some of them minor, into his 'free consciousness' style of thinking. The 'Ashram' had allegedly degenerated into unqualified hedonism and drug-running amid a foreign currency racket.
After several girls fled the 'Ashram' leveling rape charges against Premananda, he was convicted in 1997 of raping girls inside the 'Ashram' and being involved in a murder and is now serving a double life term.

I suspect the video of the Swamiji having sex is not a genuine one. The last word is yet to be heard. Let the Swamiji come out with his statement, which no doubt he would do before long, and the whole issue would die a natural death and the popularity of the Swamiji would increase and the enemies of Hinduism who fabricated the video would stand exposed.

http://mangalorean.com/index.php

Swami Nityananda caught in romp show

Correspondent
Wednesday, March 03, 2010 AT 08:05 PM (IST)
Tags: Swami Nithyananda
BENGALURU: Angry devotees and local villagers vandalized the ashram of Swami Nithyananda at Bidadi near Bengaluru after a television sting operation exposed his romp with a Tamil actress.

The swami was caught in a compromising position with the actress in Tamil Nadu, where he has a huge following..

Nityananda got into more trouble with the forest department raiding his ashram and seizing sandalwood stocked in a hideout.

An inquiry has been initiated and appropriate action would be taken, said a senior forest official. Several irregularities at the ashram have also come to light.

Villagers attacked the ashram at Bidadi and similar attacks have been reported on his ashrams in Coimbatore and other places in Tamil Nadu.

Huge boards and pictures of the Swamiji were pulled and torn by protestors. Glass panes of the ashram were damaged.

Some houses near the ashram were destroyed in a fire. It is not know whether it was an act of arson.

Although Nityananda has not reacted to the scandal, some of his devotees said the video was a mix of conspiracy, graphics and rumour.

One of his followrs Sachidanandaswamy said"We are working on a legal course of action...In these trying times, we wish to reassure the lakhs of devotees and well-wishers whose sentiments have been deeply hurt by this conspiracy"

The romp show was first telecast on Sun TV.

Some reports identify the actress to be Ragasudha while some others identify the woman as Ranjita.


The video of the swamiji having sex is morphed - the swami is shown sporting a mustache at one point. A thorough enquiry must be made. Swamiji will come out stronger and more popular after this and his enemies (who are also the enemies of Hindus) will face a downhill slide.

http://www.sakaaltimes.com/SakaalTimesBeta/20100303/4941314256134642600.htm