Thursday, June 10, 2010

Who asked Arjun Singh to free Anderson? Rajiv Gandhi?

By R Shankar, India Syndicate, 10/06/2010

The clamour is now for catching the former CEO and chairman of Union Carbide Corporation Warren Anderson for the Bhopal gas tragedy that killed over 15,000 people . Why run after a man pushing 90 summers who is well protected by the US government? Instead, catch the people who betrayed the people of Bhopal by allowing Anderson to flee and the officials who diluted the case.

Arjun Singh was the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh when the Bhopal gas tragedy occurred in 1984. It was he who arranged a state police car to rush Union Carbide chief Warren Anderson to the Bhopal airport and gave him a state plane to fly him to Delhi.
Here are some of them who betrayed the Bhopal gas victims and the collective conscience of india:
Suspect Number 1, Arjun Singh: He was the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh when the Bhopal gas tragedy happened on the night of 2-3 December, 1984. Unless he had given specific instructions, how could Anderson have got a plane to flee to Delhi and then to the US.
According to The Indian Express, on December 7, 1984, Anderson spent a few uncomfortable hours in the company's Research and Development Centre on the picturesque Shymla Hills near Bhopal. He had been arrested from the airport and taken there, four days after the world's worst industrial disaster.

Arjun Singh, now 80, received instructions from Delhi to free Anderson. Who called him up? From the urgency seen in Bhopal, it looks like the call came from the highest authority – the Prime Minister’s Office. Rajiv Gandhi was then the PM.
"He was taken aback when we told him that he was under arrest," said Moti Singh who was then Bhopal Collector. He recalled how the Anderson landed at the airport casually with a gas mask in hand. But a couple of hours later, the state and Central governments went the extra mile to make him feel comfortable and arranged a bail of Rs 25,000. Anderson had been charged with culpable homicide, a charge which was later diluted.
According to Rajkumar Keswani, one of the first journalists to break the gas leakage story, it was Singh who allowed use of the government plane after receiving a call from Delhi.

It was a mysterious call from Delhi that freed Anderson who flew to Delhi, had tea with the then president Giani Zail Singh and then fled from India, never to return. Was Rajiv Gandhi involved?
Who called Arjun Singh from Delhi and gave instructions to go soft on Anderson? Moti Singh too says that there was a call from Delhi to free Anderson. Who was the mysterious caller? Rajiv Gandhi had become prime minister only weeks earlier following Indira Gandhi's assassination.
Once the message reached Arjun Singh, he rushed in and made sure that the authorities treated Anderson well and was released without delay. A magistrate was taken to the Union Carbide guest house, he was granted bail just four hours after his arrest and then he was taken in a police car to the airport where a state plane was waiting to take Anderson to Delhi.

The Bhopal gas tragedy was the worst industrial mishap in the world. Yet, the government of India did not deal with it in all seriousness.
Considering the haste and urgency with which Arjun Singh acted, it is obvious that the call from Delhi was from the highest authority - the Prime Minister's office. So, was it Rajiv Gandhi?
The then CBI director K Vijay Rama Rao has thrown a hint when he admitted recently that the Americans were blocking the extradition. So was it Washington that put pressure on Rajiv Gandhi to let Anderson off the hook and allow him to leave the country?
Brahma Swaroop, the then Madhya Pradesh Chief Secretary. He allegedly called up the Collector to inform him that a plane was waiting at the airport for Anderson to be taken to Delhi.

The Bhopal tragedy killed over 15000 people and injured thousands.
Will Swaroop tell the nation under whose instructions did he call the collector. Moti Singh, the collector, said he never questioned his boss because "he was a man of few words and would not have liked it."
"The chief secretary summoned me to his chamber in secretariat and said that Mr Anderson was to be released and sent to Delhi by a plane which was awaiting him at the airport," claims Moti Singh according to CNNIBN.
The Congress: Apart from explaining who called up Arjun Singh and instructed him to release Anderson and provide him a plane, the Congress party will also have to explain how a man accused of killing 15,000 people and injuring thousands in the world's worst industrial disaster had tea with the then President Giani Zail Singh once he landed in Delhi.


Here too, the Prime Minister's office is suspect. Without PMO's nod, Anderson could never have stepped into the Rashtrapathi Bhavan and had tea with the president.
Consider this: Will the CEO of British Petroleum, the company behind the massive oil spill threatening the US court, ever have a coffee meet with President Barack Obama? That would be Obama's last day in office.
The CBI: The role of the CBI has never been above the water marks of controversy in the Bhopal gas case. BR Lall, the CBI officer investigating the case in 1995 when Narasimha Rao was the prime minister, has openly come out and claimed that it was the Ministry of External Affairs that had written to the CBI asking them not to pursue Anderson's extradition.

"It (note not to pursue Anderson's case) originated from External Affairs Ministry and then to it came to us. I don't know at what level the decision was taken," Lall claims
Though the claim has been denied by Lall's boss and the then CBI director K Vijay Rama Rao, the matter needs a second look as Lall claims that there was documentary evidence in this regard.
Justice A H Ahmadi: It was Justice A H Ahmadi who in 1996 reduced the criminal charges from Section 304, culpable homicide that would have attracted 10 years in jail to that of Section 304A - causing death due to negligence - that could attract just 2 years in jail for killing over 15,000 people.
Citing laws and rules, would the Supreme Court in the US let the officials of BP off the hook?
Now fresh evidence shows that Justice Ahmadi heads a trust that gets funds from Union Carbide.
So, instead of chasing Anderson, let Arjun Singh, the Congress party, the district magistrate, the officers who investigated the Bhopal gas case and the CBI come out in the open. Like in the days of kings and queens, let the traitors be tried first, not Anderson. Traitors can let down the nation many times, criminals like Anderson only once.

Arjun singh, now 80 years old, and a man bitter with the COngress high command, has so far refused to come out and speak on the controversies. Captain Jaipal Singh, the then minister in charge of general administration and publicity, says he doesn't remember what really happened in the world's worst industrial tragedy. "I was deputy minister but I can't recollect," Captain Jaipal Singh was quoted in the media. Officials who were in decision-making positions in 1984 are unwilling to throw more light on how Anderson was allowed to go. Many of them have died, and those who are alive, prefer not to speak out.
It would be difficult to get Anderson extradited from the US. This is because the law in the US says that there should be evidence to show that Anderson was directly involved in the gas leakage. In short, India should prove that Anderson was on the shop floor of the Union Carbide factory in Bhopal and that he was operating the tank from which the leakage occurred!!

K.Venugopal
#1
Thursday, 10 June 2010 12:58:13
While getting after people who were responsible for the omissions and commissions before, during and after the Bhopal tragedy 25 years later might have its own sense of deja vu, what is relevant is fixing the financial liability for the accident itself. A compensation of Rs.100 billion should be slapped on Union Carbide and its successors and the US Government should be made to stand as guarantor for the amount. Nothing less will do. Catching the culprits, some of whom have died and most are in advanced years, should be more of a symbolic act rather than something we should put all our energies into. Let us save the energy to bring US government to book on the issue of compensation
.

http://news.in.msn.com/national/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3996665&page=0

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Discontent in BJP over Rajya Sabha nominations

Updated on Wednesday, June 09, 2010, 17:52 IST
Zeenews Bureau

New Delhi: All is not well within the BJP over the candidates being chosen by the party for entry into the Rajya Sabha.

As per reports Wednesday, many senior BJP leaders are vehemently opposing the party president Nitin Gadkari’s decision to nominate noted lawyer Ram Jethmalani and former editor of RSS mouthpiece Panchajanya, Tarun Vijay, from Rajasthan and Uttarakhand respectively.

Many top rung BJP leaders including veterans like MM Joshi and Yashwant Sinha feel that there are several other more qualified aspirants in the party who deserve a Rajya Sabha berth.

As per unconfirmed reports, the absence of top leaders like LK Advani, Arun Jaitley, Rajnath Singh and Yashwant Sinha from the party’s two-day convention on good governance held on June 5 and 6 in Maharashtra, is a pointer to the rift in the party over the decision to back Vijay and Jethmalani.

The displeasure against Jethmalani’s nomination arises from the fact that he had previously contested elections against Atal Bihari Vajpayee from Lucknow.

Jethmalani had also opposed the party’s stand on the issue of execution of Parliament attack mastermind Afzal Guru

Importantly, Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi is understood to have played a role in securing a Rajya Sabha nomination for Jethmalani.

Interestingly, Jethmalani is now actively voicing the BJP’s stand and is protesting against the delay in Afzal Guru’s execution. The noted criminal lawyer has even described Vajpayee as his political hero.

With regards to Tarun Vijay, the displeasure is from the RSS side.


BJP national executive member and Organiser’s former editor Seshadri Chari has reportedly written a letter to Gadkari lamenting the decision to give a Rajya Sabha ticket to Tarun Vijay ignoring many other party workers.

I think BJP leaders should not waste their time protesting against the Rajya Sabha nominations. Some allowance has to be given to the President's prerogative. Moreover, Tarun Vijay is certainly a bright and expressive person. He should be promoted to the higher echelons. Ram Jethmalani is a giant of an individual in all respects. It would only add to our lustre to have both Tarun Vijay and Ram Jethmalani in the Rajya Sabha. Let everyone concentrate on building the organization instead of wasting their time airing publicly their displeasure over this or that nomination. The BJP has miles to go before it can think of a comeback.

http://www.zeenews.com/news632641.html

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Empire State Bldg says 'no' to Mother Teresa


New York: New York City's Empire State Building said "yes" to Mariah Carey, dog shows, cancer charities -- and even the 60th anniversary of communist China.

But the landmark skyscraper's owners have declined to illuminate it in honour of the late Mother Teresa.

"They're bigots! They have an animus against Catholics!" Catholic League President Bill Donohue told The Associated Press yesterday.


He said his lay advocacy group requested that the building glow on August 26 for the centennial of the late Nobel Peace Prize winner's birth. The request was denied in an unsigned, faxed letter, Donohue said, "and they never gave an explanation."

He said Empire State Building officials were "stonewalling" not only the Catholic League, but also the media and members of New York's City Council.

Now, another prominent New York Catholic is voicing her outrage.

City Council Speaker Christine Quinn told the AP that she spoke yesterday with Empire State Building owner Anthony Malkin.

Although the real estate mogul was "very professional" and said he "would reflect on the points I made," she said, he didn't give her a satisfactory answer.


She said the answer should be "yes to Mother Teresa."

Telephone messages left for building spokeswoman Melanie Maasch were not returned yesterday. The telephone at Malkin Holdings, Malkin's Manhattan-based company, rang unanswered last afternoon.

In New York, Mother Teresa helped open a pioneering hospice for AIDS patients in Manhattan's Greenwich Village.

"Her impact on the world was so much greater than one religious group," Quinn said.

Although she's Catholic, the Democratic City Council speaker has often disagreed with the religiously traditional League on issues such as gay marriage. Quinn is openly gay.

But when it comes to the iconic skyscraper and the ethnic Albanian nun who worked in India, she backs the League.

Illuminating the 102-story high-rise on Fifth Avenue in different colours to mark an important date, cause or personality is a New York tradition. The building is colour-decorated for religious holidays such as Christmas and Hanukkah and other special occasions.

PTI

Someone accuses the Empire State Bldg owners of being bigots for not permitting Mother Theresa celebration on the building. Mother Theresa herself was a bigot who believed that Jesus was the only salvation and sought to convert Hindus into Christianity. Charity was to her a cover to carry out her bigoted agenda. Empire State Bldg owners may eventually agree to celebrate Mother Theresa but their initial reluctance proves that not everyone is sold on to the idea that Mother Theresa was an undiluted good thing.

http://www.zeenews.com/news632543.html

Do not use military aid against India: US warns Pak

09/06/2010
Washington: Addressing one of India's major concerns, Obama Administration's point man for South Asia has said that US is taking appropriate steps to ensure that the military aid given to Pakistan is not used against India.

The issue was discussed during last week's Strategic Dialogue between India and the US; which was co-chaired by External Affairs Minister S M Krishna and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
"I think they (India) understand that we are trying to build up Pakistan's counter-insurgency capabilities and we are seeking end use assurances to insure that the weapons that are provided will not be used against India," Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, Robert Blake said in response to a question at a State Department Blog Forum.

This is for the first time US has come out in public to state that it was taking steps to ensure that its military aid to Pakistan would not be used against India. This has been one of the major concerns of the Indian leaders which were effectively conveyed to their American counterparts in the last week's strategic dialogue held at the Foggy Bottom headquarters of the State Department. Blake said India and the US have a shared interest in stabilisation of Pakistan; and New Delhi supports the US' Pak policy.

"They believe we have a shared interest in helping to stabilise Pakistan, and they're certainly well aware that a spiral down would not be in India's interests," Blake said during a conversation on a State Department blog Forum. Participating in the blog forum, Teresita Schaffer, director of South Asia Program at the CSIS - a Washington- based think-tank, said US, India, and Pakistan share an interest in seeing Pakistan as a state emerge more strongly from this terrible time that it is going through.

"This will not mean that India and Pakistan agree on a whole lot of stuff. But underneath it all, there is this very important interest in common that we shouldn't forget about,"she said.
Source: Agencies

K.Venugopal
#1
Wednesday, 09 June 2010 11:29:27
In the material society that America is (and the world aspiring to be), it is only natural that the armament industry is up there in their scheme of things. They need to and are ready to sell arms to whoever wants it. All conditions upon their clients in its usage are hypocritical and seeking to play to their geo-political gallery.

http://news.in.msn.com/internalsecurity/news/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3992092&page=0

'Case against Anderson not closed'

Updated on Tuesday, June 08, 2010, 15:41 IST

New Delhi: Even as the US remained unimpressed about the need to bring those behind the Bhopal gas tragedy to justice, the government of India on Tuesday made it clear that it will pursue the case against the Union Carbide’s ex-chief Warren Anderson.

Detailing the government’s next move, Union Law Minister Veerappa Moily accepted that the case against him (Anderson) was looked at causally.

"As far as Anderson is concerned, the case is not closed," Moily said.

He said the name of Anderson figured in the chargesheet filed by the CBI in the case.

"The CBI has filed chargesheet. The courts then frame charges. There is one person here who has not responded to the summons or replied to the charges. He has absconded and was declared a proclaimed offender," he said.

"That does not mean that the case against him (Anderson) is closed," Moily said, adding that his case has been an eye-opener.
Anderson, facing charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, has been avoiding Indian courts ever since he jumped bail in 1984. He was the CEO of Union Carbide at the time of the disaster and he along with others is accused of causing death due to negligence.

Moily did not divulge any details about whether the government would press the US to extradite him to India - as per reports; Anderson now lives in a New York suburb.

On the wider question of justice for those innocent thousands who died on December 2-3 1984, Moily said, “We need to learn lessons from it (the guilty getting away with minor punishment), right from the event to the trail and the verdict.”

“We must have holistic approach. We need a comprehensive law to look into prevention, compensation and punishment,” he stressed.

Moily also rued that “people have no fear of law” and that there was an urgent need to make sure that companies adhere to the guidelines, and also ensure that they be punished if they don’t follow the rules.
On the role of the judiciary, Moily opined that the judiciary should have taken a serious pitch of the tragedy – dubbed as the world’s biggest industrial disaster -, quickly adding that the trial and subsequent verdict is not in any way a reflection of the judiciary but time has come to revisit the judicial process.

The law minister also took strong exception to the claims now being made by former CBI officer BB Lal that the government told him to not go after Anderson; he said that he holds Lal culpable as he had the powers as an investigating officer to discharge his responsibilities, but he failed to do so.

On Monday, a lower court in Bhopal convicted all 8 accused, including the then chief of India operations Keshub Mahindra, in the gas tragedy case and sentenced them to a maximum 2 years imprisonment. However, all the accused were immediately released on bail.

The verdict comes after more than 25 years of the leak of deadly methyl isocianate from Union Carbide's chemical plant in Bhopal on December 2, 1984 that killed 15,000 (around 3,000 officially) people and injured many.


The issue, after 25 years, is not the punishment of a 89 year old man living in America. Union Carbide, the company responsible for the disaster, including its Indian subsidiary and successors, should be made to pay a compensation package of 100 billion dollars. Nothing less will do. If the company does not have the funds to pay, the American government must be made to bear the liability. There is no need to wait for another 25 years for such a verdict. The government should constitute a special bench and fast forward the case.

Also, India should ask USA to forthwith hand over Headley to Indian authorities for bringing him to justice on the Mumbai attack. Obama should be allowed to visit India only after Headley is handed over to us.

http://www.zeenews.com/news632377.html

US on Bhopal gas tragedy: Chapter is closed


As the Bhopal gas tragedy verdict is widely criticised as a mockery of justice, the United States has rejected any possibility of re-opening the Union Carbide case.(In Pics: Bhopal Gas Tragedy)

"Obviously this was one of the greatest industrial tragedies and industrial accidents in human history," US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia Robert Blake told reporters Monday. "We hope that this verdict today helps to bring some closure to the victims and their families."

"But I don't expect this verdict to reopen any new inquiries or anything like that. On the contrary, we hope that this is going to help to bring closure," he said in response to a question about the Bhopal verdict.

Blake also declined to comment when asked if the US would be more receptive to a request from India for the extradition of Warren Anderson, then chairman of the Union Carbide parent group saying "As a matter of policy, we never discuss extradition." (Read: Union Carbide reacts)

On Monday, after over 25 years, eight people were convicted for the world's worst industrial disaster and sentenced to two years in prison. About 20,000 people were killed in the Bhopal Gas tragedy of December 2-3, 1984. All those convicted, however, got bail the same day itself. (Read: Bhopal gas tragedy: Bail granted to all accused)

Those convicted in the case include Mahindra & Mahindra chief and former Union Carbide of India Chairman Keshub Mahindra. However, there was no word on Warren Anderson, who was declared an absconder after he did not subject himself to trial in the case that began 23 years ago. The former executive lives in suburban New York. (Read: Who is Warren Anderson)

Meanwhile, speaking on the Bhopal verdict, State Department spokesperson Philip Crowley said, "It was a terrible tragedy, one of the worst industrial accidents in human history. We would hope that this particular case does not inhibit expansion of economic, cultural, and political ties between our two countries. The Indian Parliament will have to make judgment on the nuclear liabilities bill, but this case...criminal case...should have no relation to the liability legislation currently before Parliament."

Linking the court verdict in the case with the nuclear liability bill, BJP on Monday made a strong plea to the government to reconsider the draft legislation contending that it "shielded" private suppliers.

Noting that discussions were underway on the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Bill, BJP spokesman Ravi Shankar Prasad said "the government should learn proper lessons from Bhopal gas tragedy. The bill, as envisaged, puts any criminal liability only on the nuclear operator."

"We urge the government not to rush with the crucial legislation. In light of bitter experience of Bhopal, the government should reconsider the nuclear bill seriously," he said.

USA is an exceedingly arrogant country. It might not have been very obvious to us before but as the economic gap between India and America closes, we would be disappointed if we except reciprocity of relationship based on equality. The Headley affair is a prime example. Why is USA acting so mysterious in granting India free access to question Headley? As things stand, USA must be damning its agencies for revealing that it has arrested Headley in the first place. Since that is already a fait accompli, they can't deny the existence of Headley. Having themselves questioned Headley, it seems that they have discovered that Headley had done dirty jobs for US agencies before and they want to be careful to ensure that details of these do not fall into Indian hands. Probably this is why they have kept Headley a difficult thing for India to get at. We have to put our foot down and tell US not be funny with us. And there need not be anything like closure of the Bhopal tragedy case as the case is still only in the lower courts of India.

http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/bhopal-gas-tragedy-as-anderson-roams-free-us-hopes-verdict-will-bring-closure-30395.php?u=1230

Monday, June 7, 2010

My question of the day: Is the Bhopal verdict a blot on the judiciary?

Answer Rajdeep Sardesai's questions

Little doubt. An expose is called for to identify all the people responsible for the derailment of justice.

http://ibnlive.in.com/blaze/rajdeep-sardesai/answer/1.html