Advani knew all about Kandahar trade-off: Brajesh Mishra

Updated on Thursday, August 27, 2009, 16:04 IST Zeenews Bureau New Delhi:

In a startling disclosure, former national security advisor (NSA) Brajesh Mishra claimed on Thursday that LK Advani was in the loop regarding all the key decisions taken with regard to the hijacking of an Indian Airlines plane to Kandahar in Afghanistan. Mishra rebutted Advani’s contention that he was unaware about IC-814 being taken from Amritsar to Kandahar by terrorists. He also rejected the view that Advani did not know that a cabinet minister (Jaswant Singh) would be flying to Kandahar to secure the release of the hostages in exchange for the three most wanted terrorists. Speaking on the issue, Mishra said that a proposal was made in the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) that Jaswant Singh should go and bring back the hostages and it was agreed by the CCS. On being probed about Advani’s claim that he was unaware of the descion to send Jaswant Singh to Kandahar, he said, “I am not going to get into anything that then home minister Advani said. I will only draw attention to the fact that key members of the cabinet committee on security (CCS) George Fernandes, Jaswant Singha and Yashwant Sinha have very clearly said he (Advani) was there.” “Let put it more charitably as George Fernandes said, may he has forgotten, quipped Mishra.
Also, a news channel has quoted Mishra as saying, “LK Advani knew all about the IC-814 hijacking. Advani agreed to send the plane to Kandahar to free the hostages. The terrorists had threatened to kill all the 160 passengers onboard. Advani knew that Jaswant (Singh) was on the plane with the terrorists.” Advani had been claiming all along that he did not know that Jaswant Singh was on the plane with the three dreaded terrorists to Kandahar. The former NSA added that it was one of the most difficult decisions the NDA government had to take. Giving details of the trade off, Mishra said, “Initial demand was for release of 36 terrorists and 200 million dollars as ransom and interned remains of some terrorist buried here. There was a unanimous ‘no’ in the CSS on it. Later negotiations began and it was whittled down to the release of three terrorists in lieu of saving the lives of 160 odd passengers.” Taking on the media Mishra rued, “I don’t want to be too critical of the media but at that time they were sponsoring the family members of the passengers to protest seeking release of terrorist.” He also claimed that all political parties had met at Vajpayee’s residence during the height of the crisis and agreed that hostages should be brought back at all costs. Mishra’s views on the Kandahar hijacking comes days after former External Affairs Minister Jaswant Singh embarrassed Advani by saying that he (Jaswant Singh) "covered" up for him (Advani) when he said that the former home minister was not aware that he was going to Kandahar with three terrorists in 1999.

It appears that what Advani meant was that he did not know that Jaswant Singh would be on the SAME plane as the terrorists till the plane took off. He did not mean that he was not aware that Jaswant Singh was going to Kandhahar. Upto a point of time it must have been taken for granted that Jawant Singh was going in a separate plane. Afterwards it must have been decided that sending two planes to Kandahar might be a security risk. This was a technical matter and Advani need not have been in the loop on this as it would have made no difference in the scheme of things for Advani to have been informed prior on this as the decision was not his to make.

http://www.zeenews.com/news558731.html

It would have been outrageous to allow 166 persons to be killed just to continue to keep 3 persons in jail, who in any case may have been let-off by one court or the other. 166 persons were saved, though 3 got away. The blood of 166 Indians would have been the greatest legacy of the NDA rule if any other decision was taken. About having details of the process of how decisions were arrived at, I do not think we would or should ever have it because they are in the realm of internal-security secrets and it is preferable that such ghosts are allowed to lie.
August 29, 2009 10:20 AM