Saturday, July 31, 2010

Brit women banned from wearing mini-skirts to work


Updated on Saturday, July 31, 2010, 15:05
London: Women in Britain's offices have been banned from wearing mini-skirts to work, and people involved in "customer-facing roles" have been told to look more professional "in a way that shows respect to children and families".

Around 400 staff in Southampton City Council's children's services department received a memo telling them they should dress respectfully and "carefully consider their work attire", the Daily Mail reported.

Council bosses said in the memo that women wearing mini-skirts could be sent home, while men have been advised to wear "collared or polo shirts, cotton trousers such as khakis or chinos with a belt".

Women can wear trousers, informal dresses or skirts of "reasonable" length, but "not mini-skirts".

"Please try to dress smartly and thoughtfully, in line with other professionals you come across in your day-to-day work, and in a way that shows respect to children and families," it said.

Women, however, have threatened to fight the ban, as one of them said: "Are they going to come around with a tape measure?"

"I would have thought the council has got better things to do than impose a regimented approach to what people wear," said Mike Tucker, secretary of a union.

Mini-skirts, which have been around for generations now, suddenly has for some people become disrespectable. Shrinking of clothes would not be as dangerous as shrinking of minds.

http://www.zeenews.com/news644811.html

US church to burn Quran on Sept 11


Updated on Saturday, July 31, 2010, 13:11

New York: A church in Florida, US, is reportedly planning to host an "International Burn a Quran Day" on the anniversary of the Sep 11, 2001, terror attack, a move that has been condemned by many Christians and Muslims.

The Dove World Outreach Centre in Gainesville, Florida, would host the event to remember 9/11 victims and take a stand against Islam, which it calls a "deceptive religion" and "of the devil".

The church is promoting the event on its website and Facebook page and has invited Christians to burn the Muslim holy book at its premises from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m.

"We believe that Islam is of the devil, that it's causing billions of people to go to hell, it is a deceptive religion, it is a violent religion and that is proven many, many times," church pastor Terry Jones was quoted as saying by the CNN.

The Facebook page has more than 1,600 fans. "Eternal fire is the only destination the Quran can lead people to, so we want to put the Quran in its place - the fire!" the page says.

The church also launched a YouTube video to disseminate the message.

"I mean ask yourself, have you ever really seen a really happy Muslim? As they're on the way to Mecca? As they gather together in the mosque on the floor? Does it look like a real religion of joy?" Jones says in the YouTube video. "No, to me it looks like a religion of the devil."

Jones also said he has written a book titled "Islam is of the Devil", and that the church sells coffee mugs and shirts featuring the phrase.

Muslim and Christian groups have, meanwhile, launched a protest against the event.

The National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) issued a statement urging the church to cancel the event, warning it could cause worldwide tension between the two religions.

"The NAE calls on its members to cultivate relationships of trust and respect with our neighbours of other faiths. God created human beings in his image, and therefore all should be treated with dignity and respect," it said.

Another Facebook group with more than 3,100 fans said it stands "against the disrespect and intolerance that these people have for the Muslim people".

An Islamic advocacy group - Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) - has said it would give out 100,000 copies of the Quran to local, state and national leaders, in a bid to educate the public during the month-long fast of Ramadan.

"American Muslims and other people of conscience should support positive educational efforts to prevent the spread of Islamophobia," CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper said.

IANS

If a call to burn a scripture is given by any group in India, we can be sure that the government would make preemptive moves to arrest the leaders who gave such a call and deploy the police in strong measure to prevent the act from actually taking place. But I understand in America the government would do nothing of this sort because they consider it as the right of expression of its citizens. Is this true? Can someone please enlighten me on the exact legal/constitutional position in America?

http://www.zeenews.com/news644794.html

Thursday, July 29, 2010

No Burqa, No teaching

29/07/2010

In a shocking development a teacher who denied to wear a burqa in a West Bengal Muslim university, has been barred from teaching.

For the past three months, 24-year-old Sirin Middya has not been able to hold her classes at West Bengal's first Muslim university. While the guidelines at Aliah University in Kolkata don't stipulate the same, the students' union has demanded that Middya can teach but only in burqa.

Middya was appointed a guest lecturer at the university in March this year and got the union "diktat" in the second week of April. "I was told that I would not be allowed to attend college if I did not agree to come in a burqa. The University Grants Commission does not prescribe any such dress code and even the university does not have a dress code. But the most unfortunate part is that students are forcing us to wear burqa," Middya told The Indian Express.

According to her, she has no issues with wearing a burqa -- but if she dons one, it would be of her own free will.

Siamat Ali, secretary of West Bengal Madrasah Students' Union, says he doesn't understand Middya's problem.

"There are eight women teachers at the university. It was decided through consulation that the women will observe purdah, and most teachers agreed. Only this lady has a problem," Ali said, adding that they were ready to welcome Middya back as long as she adhered to the "decent" dress code.

The university has chosen to play safe, putting the issue on the backburner and hoping it dies down.

"This is a stray incident... we tried to nip the problem in the bud. There is no dress code in our university. Since there was a problem, we asked the teacher to report to the Salt Lake campus," said Vice-Chancellor Syed Shamshul Alam.

The university was set up in 2008 by upgrading the famous Calcutta Madrasah which was started in 1781 by Warren Hastings, Governor General of Bengal. One of the oldest centres of higher learning and culture in the country, the institution has had many eminent scholars in its ranks. Aliah University was expected to harmonise tradition and modernity, and while its Islamic cources are run in the Calcutta Madrasah building, the other academic activities are conducted on different campuses at Salt Lake.

Middya joined Aliah University after an M.A. in Bengali from Jadavpur University. Having refused to kow-tow to the union, she has been unable to go to Aliah's Calcutta Madrasah campus, and reports to the university's library at Salt Lake. "Without taking any classes, I am given the full prescribed salary by the university," said Middya.

"Most of the teachers do not like the diktat of the students to wear burqa. But they have no option but to accept it. This is Talibanisation of educational premises and there is no one to our rescue," she said.

On June 4, nearly two months after she was virtually barred from the campus, Middya wrote to West Bengal's Minister for Minority Development Abdus Sattar. She said she was yet to get a response.

Prior to this episode, Aliah University had faced another row when the students' union held protests demanding that the word "madrasah" be added to its name.

With the university itself silent on the Middya issue, other teachers' unions such as the All Bengal University Teachers Association (ABUTA) have decided to launch a movement.

"The university and the government should have protected this teacher and other teachers so that their fundamental rights were not infringed upon. Whereas in other parts of the world, even in Muslim countries, wearing a burqa is not mandatory, here the Left Front government has failed to protect the rights of the teacher," said Tarun Naskar, general secretary of ABUTA.

Source: The Indian Express

K.Venugopal
Thursday, 29 July 2010 01:58:42
This approach of the Muslim University authorities should not be permitted. In India, unlike France where they are intending to ban the burqa, there is no ban of burqa in keeping with the Indian (read Hindu) culture that permits multiplicity of expressions, whether in religion, dress or food. The freedom is to wear burqa or not wear burqa. Forcing someone to wear the burqa, particularly someone matured enough to take her own decisions like a school teacher, is certainly against her freedom. The argument that an institution has the right to sets its dress or uniform code is valid upto a point. It has to be found out whether in this particular institution there is indeed such a dress code. If there is, the code should followed by everyone irrespective of their religion. If a particular dress code is applicable only to individuals belonging to a certain religion, it is discrimination on the basis of religion and this cannot be allowed in any institution. Moreover, it has to be found out whether the burqa can be used as a dress code at all in any institution, particularly if the institution is not a mosque or prayer hall.


http://education.in.msn.com/news/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4208470&page=0

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Govt mulling OBC quota for Muslims: Khurshid

Updated on Wednesday, July 28, 2010, 10:23

New Delhi: The government is actively considering reservation for Muslims through the Other Backward Castes (OBC) route, Minority Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid has said.

"We are actively looking at the reservation issue. We have a commitment in our (Congress) manifesto. I am pushing for it all the time.... Congress leadership is committed to the issue and there is no shred of doubt about it," he said in an interview here.

Khurshid was replying to questions on whether the government is ready to implement the recommendations of the Ranganath Mishra Commission for reservation to minorities.

The Commission, whose report was tabled in Parliament in December last year, had recommended 10 per cent reservation for Muslims and five per cent for other minorities in government jobs.

The Commission had also suggested an alternative route for reservation to minorities if there is "insurmountable difficulty" in implementing the recommendation for 15 per cent reservation.

According to the Mandal Commission report, minorities constitute 8.4 per cent of the total OBC population. So in the 27 per cent OBC quota, an 8.4 per cent sub quota should be earmarked for minorities of which 6 per cent should be for Muslims.

"They (Mishra Commission) are saying either do it as 15 per cent or as share of 27 per cent. We are moving on the second option," Khurshid said, adding that this option was also recommended by the Sachar Committee, which looked into the issue of the backwardness of Muslims.

Asked whether the UPA is ruling out the first option of giving 15 per cent reservation to minorities as a while, Khurshid said, "Not ruling out the first option, we are moving on the second option."

The Minority Affairs Minister said that though his ministry is not the one to decide over the issue, he was in constant touch with the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment as they are the ones who have to do it.

"I am obviously involved in the conceptualisation of this," he said.

Congress president Sonia Gandhi had reportedly assured a delegation of Muslim leaders in May this year that modalities for providing reservation to Muslims would be worked out in six months.

The party is learnt to be in favour of providing reservations to minorities on the lines of the quota structure that is already in place in Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu.

Tamil Nadu has 3.5 per cent reservation for Muslims within 27 per cent quota for backward castes, while Congress ruled Andhra Pradesh has given 4 per cent reservation to Muslims, which was also upheld by the Supreme Court.

Would Hindu OBCs be ok with any eating into their share of reservations? Or would Hindu OBCs prefer to consider themselves as Dalits and not Hindus and therefore be comfortable with Muslims in the name of Dalits sharing reservations? Once the organized religions get into the OBC bandwagon, they will take over and the original OBCs would be left out. Beware Hindus, the ground is being sought to be cut under your feet.

http://www.zeenews.com/news643961.html

SY Quraishi: India’s first Muslim CEC

Updated on Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 21:34

New Delhi: Low-profile S Y Quraishi, brings with him rich experience as a thoroughbred civil servant of more than 35 years to become the first Muslim Chief Election Commissioner of India.

63-year-old Shahabuddin Yaqoob Quraishi, who will have a little more than two years as CEC, has already served the Election Commission for more than four years and has a solid grounding in the institution that has earned a name for conducting free and fair elections.

A product of St Stephen's College in Delhi, Quraishi joined the IAS in 1971 and had worked in the governments both Centre and state levels.

He had earned distinction for his study of modern Persian, Arabic and German languages before joining the civil service. Later in his career, Quraishi received a Ph.D for his thesis on "Role of Communication and Social Marketing in Development of Women and Children".

Quraishi is known for his scholarly work on innovative approaches to issues faced by the Muslim community.

Before his induction into the Commission in 2006, Quraishi held the post of Secretary, Sports and Youth Affairs in the Centre.

He had held several key positions in the government and had made special contribution in the areas of social sector reforms covering health, education, population, drug abuse and civil society action.

Quraishi is an expert on gender and HIV/AIDS and is known for his extensive work in the field of population, women and child development, youth and adolescent issues. UN and other international organisations have availed his experience in these areas.

He has a number of books, articles and talks to his credit on issues related to democracy, elections and social sector issues. He had authored two path-breaking papers 'Islam, Muslims and Family Planning in India' and 'Islam and AIDS'.

-PTI

Here's wishing Quraishi all the best as CEC, with the hope that he would not be a stooge of any political party like the current CEC, who was obviously a Congress stooge.

http://www.zeenews.com/news643894.html

Aiyar ‘happy’ as rains play spoilsport for CWG preparations

Updated on Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 16:41

New Delhi: Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar on Tuesday said he would be "unhappy" if the Commonwealth Games were a success and that only "evil" will patronise them, remarks which were quickly dismissed by both his party and the BJP.

"I am delighted in a way because rains are causing difficulties for the Commonwealth Games. Basically, I will be very unhappy, if the Games are successful because then they will start bringing Asian Games, Olympic Games and all these," the former union sports minister told reporters outside Parliament House.

The Rajya Sabha MP lashed out at the massive expenditure being incurred for the October event.

"Those who are patronising the Games can only be evil. They cannot be God," Aiyar, a known critic of the Games who has vent his ire often in the past, said.

He said instead of spending a whopping Rs 35,000 crore on the Games, the money should have been spent on children.

"Thousands of crores are being spent on circuses like these while the common children are being deprived of basic facilities to play," Aiyar said, adding all "expectations" from the Games had been belied.

Congress was quick to dismiss Aiyar's comments.

"I do not take him seriously," Congress MP Sandeep Dikshit said.

BJP, which has also raised questions about the preparations and the manner in which funds were being used, said irresponsible statements should not be made on the issue.

"The Central and state government should understand that prestige of the country is associated with the Commonwealth Games. Irresponsible statements should not be made on the issue," BJP spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said.

Taking exception to Aiyar's remarks, Samajwadi Party said that those opposing the Games were doing so for "sadistic pleasure".

"We are not sadists. Those who are opposing the Games are doing so for sadistic pleasure. Such language should not be used.... We are in favour of the Commonwealth Games but the huge funds which have been blown up should be investigated. The Games could have been held for much less," SP spokesperson Mohan Singh said.

Several political parties have criticised the pace of preparations and expressed apprehensions that infrastructure like stadiums and shooting ranges may not be ready in time.

Another BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar alleged that though huge funds have been spent on Games preparations, there was no control on quality.

Aiyar told reporters that the government should have a rethink before bidding for Asian Games or other such international events in future.

He was also critical of one lakh dollars given to countries like Australia, New Zealand and Canada for sports saying these nations did not need the funds which should have been spent in the country.

PTI

Mani has gone bonkers after being miffed about losing the Sports Ministry. Now he has made a totally unpatriotic statement, though not surprising coming from a man who hates Veer Sarvarkar. Mani is headed towards the lunatic asylum. Poor chap.

http://www.zeenews.com/news643768.html

Monday, July 26, 2010

Five-time Cong MP from Kerala disqualified for caste fraud

PTI, Jul 26, 2010, 06.26pm IST

KOCHI: The Kerala High court on Monday disqualified five-time MP Kodukunnil Suresh from Mavelikara (Reserved) constituency declaring his election void, holding that he was not entitled to claim the benefits and privileges available to the members of the Scheduled Caste.

Allowing the election petition of defeated candidate A S Anil Kumar (CPI) and two others, Justice M Shasdhidharan Nambiar found that Suresh was not a member of 'Cheramar' community and thereby he was not a Scheduled Caste.

Justice Nambiar held that he is 'disqualified' to contest from Mavelikara constituency as it is reserved for Schedule Castes.

The court found that Suresh had produced contradictory caste certificates issuing by Tahsildars of Kottarakara and Nedumangad.

In the 194-page judgement, the court criticised the action of the Returning officer and observed that he should not have accepted the nomination without a finding that Suresh is a member of Scheduled Caste.

Holding that acceptance of Suresh's nomination was 'improper', Justice Nambiar directed the Registry to communicate the decision to Election Commission and Speaker of Lok sabha immediately.

Suresh, who first entered the Lok Sabha in 1989 from Adoor and subsequently thrice from the same constituency in 1991, 1996 and 1998, was declared elected from Mavelikkara with a majority of 48,046 votes in 2009 elections.

Adoor ceased to be a Lok Sabha constituency after the delimitation. On his part, Suresh, an AICC Secretary, told reporters he would appeal against the High Court order in the Supreme Court.

He blamed some sections within his party and opposition parties for filing the case behind which he saw a conspiracy.

Challenging the election, the petitioners approached the court complaining that Suresh was not entitled for the benefit of Reservation as he does not oblong to the Scheduled Caste community.

The court evaluating the evidence of various witnesses said that the evidence do not suggest that Suresh belongs to scheduled caste community.

'Even if various certificates produced by Kodikunnil are accepted, it would not prove that Suresh belongs to Scheduled Caste," it observed.

Referring to a certificate dated Oct 25, 1979 that Suresh had embraced Hinduism as per Sudhi certificate by Kerala Hindu Mission and his name in the SSLC book is Manianna J and he was a 'Cheramar Christian", the court said it cannot be accepted.

It said evidence has been established that the Mission President had been issuing certificates after receiving donations and fees.

The certificate was issued when he was minor and a minor could not not have exercised his discretion, it held adding the certificate would also not not establish that Suresh has been accepted by the Cheramar community in their fold.

Hence, from the evidence it can be held that even though Suresh has been professing Hinduism there was no no acceptable evidence to prove that he has been as a member either of 'Cheramar' or 'Pulaya' communities of the Scheduled Caste, the court said.

Suresh tried to establish his case by claiming that he was invited for the function of Kerala Pulaya Mahasabha in Kochi, which showed that he was accepted by them in their community.

However, the court said the same function was addressed by Congress President Sonia Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition in Kerala Assembly, KPCC President Ramesh Chennithala. By their participation they do not not become members of Pulaya community, the court held.

"By attending the meeting, it cannot be said Suresh was accepted as member by the Pulaya community," the court said.

Suresh had produced two certificates issued by two Tahsildars. While Nedumangad tahsildar certificate shows his caste as 'Hindu Cheramar', Kottarakara Tahsildar's certificates show him as 'Hindu Pulaya'.

The court held that the two certificates were not not reliable.

The petitioner, Anil, contended that two certificates were issued within one hour and without conducting any enquiry. The marriage certificate of Suresh was not not in accordance with rites of Pulaya or Cheramar communities, he had contended.


Even before the Congress government passes the law to declare religious minorities eligible for reservations, the organized religions, Christianity in this case, has cheated a genuine Hindu beneficiary and instead a Christian has usurped the benefit. Therefore beware what would happen when minority reservation comes into effect. It is Sonia Gandhi's plan to destroy Hinduism.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Five-time-Cong-MP-from-Kerala-disqualified-for-caste-fraud/articleshow/6219757.cms#write

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Shah's resignation: BJP says designs of CBI will be exposed

Updated on Saturday, July 24, 2010, 11:22 IST

New Delhi: BJP on Saturday stood behind Gujarat Minister Amit Shah, who resigned after being charged with murder in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh case, saying the "mischievous designs of the CBI" will be exposed in court.

"We have always had the highest regard for our judicial system and always cooperate with law, so there will be a legal fight in the court," BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar said.

He maintained that though Shah has resigned, the party was fully with him and will be raising its voice against "abuse of CBI for political purposes."

"He will fight against the mischievous designs of CBI in the court and the truth will be upheld," Javadekar said.

Shah, a close associate of Chief Minister Narendra Modi, resigned from the state ministry, a day after CBI charged him with murder in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case.

PTI

Sohrabuddin was a gangster who graduated to a terrorist. It was the Central government which first tipped off the Gujarat government about Sohrabuddin. Therefore the Gujarat government's revelation that Sohrabuddin was on his way to kill Narendra Modi is credible. They were not in the mood to take things easy and treat Sohrabuddin as a son-in-law as the Congress would have done and has done in the case of Afzal Mohammad. It was such non-nonsense approach by the Modi government that has kept Gujarat largely terrorism-free all these years. Now the CBI, under Congress tutelage, wants to link Amit Shah (and maybe eventually Narendra Modi) with Sohrabuddin's pre-terrorist days as gangster and discover a motive there. If they can say that the motive was other than killing a terrorist, they can divert the public focus from terrorism and take the halo away from the strong men of Gujarat who kept the terrorists at bay. The insidious anti-national plot of the Congress must be exposed.

http://www.zeenews.com/news643249.html

Thursday, July 22, 2010

How a Cong trade union leader became BJP chief

TNN, Jul 22, 2010, 12.37am IST

NEW DELHI: How did an INTUC leader become BJP president? Or did the BJP leader carry out a stealthy acquisition. Several years ago, Nitin Gadkari, as an influential local leader, won a convincing victory at the Nagpur branch of the Congress-affiliated trade union.

The event did raise some comment, Gadkari's coup being acknowledged as pretty smart footwork. But now, after the leader took charge of a troubled BJP from Rajnath Singh some months ago, it is downright embarrassing for Congress to have Gadkari presiding over INTUC affairs in the orange city.

At an informal exchange at the TOI office on Wednesday, Gadkari revealed that he had been worried by BJP's falling support in various parts of eastern Maharashtra, Nagpur included. He floated a workers' initiative and began to approach workers who had opted for voluntary retirement schemes but were finding it hard to get their dues.

The BJP chief said he discovered that local trade union leaders were taking cuts from payments made to workers, many of whom were employed in textiles. He approached the then textiles minister in the NDA government, Kashiram Rana, and persuaded him that payments ought to be made directly to accounts of workers who had accepted VRS. This way they would evade the avaricious designs of TU bosses.

"I think I earned the goodwill of a lot of workers who were not well-off and were from different communities, including the minorities. They were relieved that they did not have to succumb to the demands. The amount involved was not small, it was Rs 8 crore," said Gadkari.

Emboldened to stand for the next INTUC election, Gadkari was supported by 22 of 33 members of the executive and soon found himself at the TU's office at Vaidyanath Chowk. It was quite an experience as he spied portraits of Congress greats Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi on the walls instead of the more familiar pictures of Deen Dayal Upadhyaya and Shyama Prasad Mookerjee that grace BJP offices.

On to a good thing, Gadkari hasn't let go since, maintaining his grip on the INTUC post. It, perhaps, did not matter as long as he operated out of Nagpur. But after RSS backed him and he transited to the big stage, having an INTUC man as BJP president may not suit Congress very much even though the Nagpur unit may not be complaining. Neither is Gadkari.

This man appears to have quite a few aces up his sleeves, not just colourful lapdogs/poodle, son-in-law metaphors. He might just yet pull the rabbit of power out of the election hat - clearly a man to watch.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/How-a-Cong-trade-union-leader-became-BJP-chief/articleshow/6198337.cms#write

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Headley: Upset US asks India to act responsibly

Updated on Thursday, July 22, 2010, 09:58 IST
Chicago: With Indian officials going public with what LeT operative David Headley had told investigators, the US on Thursday said it fully expects "both countries to live up to their respective responsibilities".

Amid reports that the Obama administration was upset over Indian officials going into the details provided by Headley, State Department spokesman P J Crowley said the US values cooperation with India on combating terrorism but it places responsibility on both countries.

"We fully expect both countries to live up to their respective responsibilities," Crowley told reporters at his daily news conference.

Crowley was responding to a question about an Indian media report that stated that the US is upset about the statements coming out from senior Indian officials, revealing details of information the Mumbai terror suspect provided to Indian interrogators recently.

At the conclusion of the questioning of Headley by Indian investigators on June 10, the US Justice Department had said: "To protect the confidentiality of the investigations being conducted by both India and the US, both countries have agreed not to disclose the contents of the interviews".

American officials have reportedly expressed concern that public discussions on Headley could adversely affect the case against him in the United States.

"We value the cooperation between India and the United States on law enforcement and combating terrorism; it's important. It does place responsibilities on both countries," Crowley said.

Union Home Secretary GK Pillai had disclosed last week that Headley had confirmed that Pakistan's ISI was involved with 26/11 "from beginning to end".

This was followed by National Security Advisor Shivshankar Menon speaking on "the links between the official establishment and existing intelligence agencies" in Pakistan as revealed by Headley.

"If anything, it is getting stronger," Menon had said. Crowley said the US is aware about such statements but restrained from responding in detail.

"I'm just going to simply say that our cooperation is significant. It is a vital dimension of our relationship. It's important for both sides. In this cooperation there are responsibilities that we both have, and I'll leave it there".

The Department of Justice refused to make any comment on the issue. "No comments," a DOJ spokesman said when asked about the reports.

Meanwhile in Chicago, Headley's lawyer John Theis also refused to comment on any of the substance of the meetings that he had with Indian authorities here when they came to interrogate Headley.

The National Investigation Agency team had come here from India in the first week of June to question Headley over the Mumbai attack plot.

Sources said they had learnt that sometimes in the Indian press, things are not reported entirely accurately.

PTI

I think it is America that is acting irresponsibly, particularly in the fight against terrorism. Why are they holding tight to an ace terrorist like Headley and restricting India's access to him? Shouldn't they hand the chap over to India? America has always sought to play Big Daddy in our region. But this should no longer be allowed. India must solve its problems by itself, with or without America’s cooperation.

http://www.zeenews.com/news642732.html

Headley revelation: Pillai could have waited, says Krishna


Updated on Wednesday, July 21, 2010, 18:16 IST
New Delhi: Indian External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna Wednesday rued that Home Secretary G.K. Pillai's remarks about the role of the ISI in 26/11 attack were made on the eve of his talks with Pakistan.

"Mr. Pillai could have waited till I came back to issue a statement. Perhaps it would have been wiser if that statement had not been made just on the eve of my visit," Krishna said in an interview to a TV channel, the first time he has made public his displeasure with Pillai.

Pillai had commented that the Mumbai carnage of Nov 28, 2008, was planned by the ISI "from beginning to end".

"When two Foreign Ministers are meeting after the Mumbai attack, there was a special significance for this meeting," Krishna said.

"Everyone who was privy to whatever was happening in government of India ought to have known that the right kind of atmosphere from India's side should have been created for the talks to go on in a very normal manner, but unfortunately this episode happened," he added.

"Well, I have had some discussions with the Prime Minister," Krishna replied when asked if he had conveyed his dissatisfaction over Pillai's remarks to the prime minister.

After his talks with Krishna in Islamabad July 15, Pakistan's Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said at a joint press conference that the remarks made by India's home secretary were not "helpful" for better relations when a journalist asked him about Pakistan's action against Hafiz Saeed, the suspected mastermind of the Mumbai attack.

The next day, Krishna told reporters in Delhi that there was no comparison with Saeed and Pillai as the former was crying jihad against India.

Krishna's criticism of Pillai has brought out in the open differences of perception within the government over engagement with Pakistan.

At a seminar here Tuesday, Menon had endorsed Pillai's remarks by pointing out links between the official establishment and the existing intelligence agencies.

Krishna, however, was also critical of Qureshi's abrasive style in his interaction with the media.

"We should understand the spirit of Thimphu and spirit of Thimphu was to make earnest effort to bring about reconciliation between two countries and I do not want that spirit to be eroded even by a remotest possible way," he said.

"I think we can put forward any contention that a country can face in a most forceful way but there has to be dignity, there has to be civility and civility is certainly no weakness," he added.

Even when Krishna was in Islamabad July 16, Qureshi held a press conference with Pakistani journalists and criticised India for its selectively focusing on terror and sidelining other vital bilateral issues like Kashmir.

-IANS

Pakistan's Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi says that the remarks made by India's home secretary were not "helpful" for better relations. What he meant is that for better relations, India should grin and bear Pakistani terrorist attacks. And we have a worm of a Foreign Minister who appears willing to more than grin and bear it so that he can stitch a deal with Pakistan that can be hailed as a step in the direction of peace and get Obama’s pat on the shoulder when he comes here in November and get the votes of Muslims. Of course, peace for Pakistan means that we think of Pakistan’s terrorist game plan only in terms of peace!

http://www.zeenews.com/news642585.html

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Sexual harassment allegations rock Indian women's hockey

21/07/2010

New Delhi: Indian women’s hockey was rocked by allegations of sexual harassment Tuesday after a player accused a team official of demanding sexual favours from her during an overseas tour.
The woman player, whose identity has not been disclosed, has sent a written complain to Hockey India (HI).
In another shocking revelation, the women's team's videographer Basava Raja was also filmed with call girls in compromising positions during the overseas tour of China and Canada.
HI secretary-general Narinder Batra said: "These are shocking allegations and we are going to take strong actions if these allegations are proved true. We have formed a four-member body and they will meet on Wednesday to investigate the charges."
"Strict action will be taken against the videographer if the charges are proved true," Batra added.
Former India captains Ajit Pal Singh and Zafar Iqbal are a part of the panel. Sudarshan Pathak and Rajeev Mehta are the other two members of the panel.
Source: IANS

K.Venugopal
#1
Wednesday, 21 July 2010 10:21:24
Our nation must wake up to the fact that the most debilitating weakness that is creeping upon it is a lack of character among its citizens - which is leading to financial corruption as well as moral corruption. This malaise must be addressed. We must heed to the call of Swami Vivekananda on the need for a man making mission.


http://sports.in.msn.com/othersports/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4179367&page=0

Goa blast: Accused Sanstha men called ‘terrorists’

Updated on Tuesday, July 20, 2010, 17:41 IST
Panaji: The four Sanatan Sanstha (SS) members accused of carrying out the 2009 Diwali-eve blast in Goa were for the first time Tuesday reffered to as "terrorists" by the state home department.

State Home Minister Ravi Naik said in a written reply to the legislative assembly: "In the year 2009/10, four terrorists have been arrested by Goa Police in bomb blast incidents, which took place at Margao and Verna, respectively, on the night of Diwali i.e. on 16/10/2010."

A local court has framed charges against the four members namely Vinay Talekar, Vinayak Patil, Dhananjay Ashtekar and Dilip Mangaonkar.

Five other accused, also members of the SS, are still absconding, according to police.

The accused have been framed under penal provisions dealing with waging war against the government, collecting arms and mischief.

Charges have also been ordered to be framed under various sections of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the Explosive Substances Act.

Malgonda Patil and Yogesh Naik, the two SS members who were ferrying detonator-rigged gelatin sticks to a crowded place on Diwali eve, died when the explosive contraption they were carrying exploded accidentally in Margao town in south Goa, 35 km from here.

Luckily, another improvised explosive device (IED) placed in a pick up van near Verna, 25 km from here, did not explode.

Nearly 250 witnesses were examined by police in the course of the investigations, which were taken over by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), after being initially handled by Goa Police.

-IANS

Calling them terrorists would be no problem, if indeed they are proven to be so. But to call them Hindu terrorists is erroneous because the Hindu religion does not believe in terrorism. In fact, those who were dedicated to terrorism in Hindu mythology were called Rakshasas and Hinduism is all about destroying Rakshasas. If any adjective is to be used at all, they could be called reprisal terrorists, because that is what has led this terrorism - reprisal against terrorism foisted upon the society by Islamic terrorism. (Islamic terrorism is part of the Islamic legacy. The history of Jihad is enough to prove this.)

http://www.zeenews.com/news642348.html

Monday, July 19, 2010

HC restores MCOCA against Sadhvi


Updated on Monday, July 19, 2010, 18:57 IST
Zeenews Bureau

Mumbai: Setting aside the lower court order, the Bombay High Court on Monday restored the charges under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) against all the 11 accused in last year’s Malegaon bomb blast case including Sadhvi Pragnya Thakur.

Today’s ruling of the Bombay High Court is a boost to the investigators probing the Malegaon blast case as it comes nearly an year after a Mumbai special court ordered the dropping of charges under the stringent MCOCA.

The MCOCA special court had granted the relief on grounds that the charge-sheet filed against one of the prime accused, Rakesh Dhawade by the police in a matter pertaining to the Jalna court, was not sustainable.

The Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS), Mumbai, had arrested 11 people, including the Sadhvi in connection with the Sep 29, 2008 Malegaon blast which left six dead and 20 injured.

The prominent accused include Sadhvi Pragnya, Chandrapal Singh Thakur, alias Purna Chetnanandagiri, Lt.Col Prasad S. Purohit, a serving Indian Army officer who helped to procure RDX for the blasts, retired Indian Army major Ramesh Upadhyaya, who allegedly trained the conspirators in bomb making techniques; Shymlal Sahu, owner of a mobile phone shop in Bhopal, who allegedly planted the bomb and Rakesh Dhawade, a Pune-based weapons expert, who is accused of helping the conspirators procure weapons.

Terrorism by Hindus cannot be labeled as Hindu terrorism because terrorism is not on the agenda of Hinduism, unlike the Jihadi religion. It can only be called reprisal terrorism because Hindus have been under attack for a long time now. The Government wants to use the case of Sadhvi Pragna to curb the RSS so that Hindus will lack the leadership the RSS offers and then Hindus can be partitioned between Islam and Christianity and Communism and Secularists and Casteists. The RSS must rise to the occasion and say that it will not be cowed down.

http://www.zeenews.com/news642077.html

Sunday, July 18, 2010

RSS leader denies terror links


18 Jul 2010, 2106 hrs IST
Senior RSS leader Indresh Kumar whose name has come up in some media reports over alleged links with Mecca Masjid blasts suspects, on Saturday said the 'false propaganda' against him and his organisation was part of a 'deep political conspiracy' to malign nationalists.

"I have had no faith in any violent activity. I condemn this false propaganda. This is a deep political conspiracy based on untruth through which nationalists and patriots are being maligned," Kumar said in a statement.

He alleged that reports in some newspapers and news channels to link his name and that of the RSS to some violent (terror) events is an attempt to create confusion.

"It is sad that these reports were sensationalised," he alleged.

Kumar insisted that RSS had been engaged in public education and public service for the past 85 years and he himself has been active in this field for four decades.

"I am deeply hurt by the dragging of my name and that of the Sangh in this false propaganda," Kumar said. He argued that service to the nation was the basic aim of the Sangh.

An impression has gained ground that the Hindus are a meek lot and would put up with any number of assaults upon them by Islamic terrorism with at most some democratic protests and beyond that hoping that the law enforcement agencies in the country would work to end Islamic terrorism. But it has become obvious to common Hindus that whatever be the capacity of Indian law enforcement agencies, they are curbed by Indian politicians swearing by the secular credo. Far from taking measures to end Islamic terrorism, supported by Pakistan, these secular forces are laying ground for the Islamic terrorists to attain their goal even without resorting to violence. One such plot is to grant reservations on the basis of religion. This will allow Islamic terrorists to achieve a new front in the name of Dalits and challenge the very nationhood of India. Therefore, expecting no ending of Islamic and other minority plots against India, the common Hindu would have thought of direct action against anti-India forces. To hold the RSS as being behind these attacks is actually a failure to understand what the Hindu psyche has become due to repeated appeasement of the minorities by the secular parties at the expense of Hindus. Instead of addressing the cause for this new phenomenon of Hindu terrorism, the Congress is using the opportunity to attack the RSS. This is typical Congress response of seeking to please its minority voters, knowing that the majority voters can be taken for granted.

http://www.timesnow.tv/INDIA/RSS-leader-denies-terror-links/videoshow/4349844.cms

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Indo-Pak talks have not collapsed: Nirupama Rao

IANS, Jul 17, 2010, 01.15pm IST

NEW DELHI: Foreign secretary Nirupama Rao on Saturday rebuffed Pakistani foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi's claim that his Indian counterpart had supported him in his criticism of home secretary GK Pillai, saying "India did not express any agreement with Pakistan's comments on Pillai".

Rao also lent support to Pillai's statement ahead of the Islamabad talks that Pakistani spy agency Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) had a significant role in the Mumbai terror attack, saying that India is definitely concerned about ISI's role in 26/11.

"We are definitely concerned about the role of state actors in terrorism," Rao told a news channel in an interview.

In an interview, Pillai had stated that Lashkar-e-Taiba agent David Headley's questioning by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) had confirmed that "ISI had a much more significant role to play in the Mumbai attacks..."

"ISI was literally controlling and coordinating the attacks from the beginning till the end," Pillai had stated.

The Indian foreign secretary reiterated that the talks between the two nations had not collapsed.

"There are differences in perception, but the gap is not unbridgeable," she said.

Rao said that the tone and tenor of Qureshi's remarks could have been better.

"In diplomacy, as in life, such ups and downs are common," she said.

In another TV interview on Friday night, Rao had stressed that the India-Pakistan talks had not "collapsed" and the dialogue process between them "must go on".

She had told a news channel that Qureshi's critical remarks about Krishna had come as "a real surprise" for India.

"The comments (by Qureshi) came as a surprise, there was no real reason for the comments," the foreign secretary said.

Qureshi at a press conference in Islamabad took potshots at Krishna and launched a broadside against India's what he called "selective focus on terror". He even said the "Indian foreign minister received foreign policy directions from New Delhi repeatedly during our meeting".

India is wasting its time with Pakistan. Pakistan must be declared enemy state of India. It is Pakistan which is not allowing us to build close relations with Afghanistan. It is fully supporting the terrorists who are active in Kashmir. It is building an anti-India relationship with China. India must pay Pakistan back in the same coin. We must openly support independence movements in Pakistan. We must be prepared to cross the border to destroy Kashmir terrorist camps there. We must given America a choice - either they are with us or with Pakistan. India must arouse its nationalism to source its strength against its enemies.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Indo-Pak-talks-have-not-collapsed-Nirupama-Rao/articleshow/6180339.cms

Friday, July 16, 2010

RSS men attack news channel after sting operation

Updated on Friday, July 16, 2010, 19:30 IST

New Delhi: A TV news channel was attacked by around 600 furious activists of the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh on Friday evening for running an expose on an alleged Hindu terror outfit that is said to be involved in the Malegaon blast.

Earlier in the day a sting operation was telecasted showing some RSS top leaders and BJP MP BL Sharma who were plotting to assassinate Vice President Hamid Ansari and conspiring against Muslim Indian leaders.

“I was carrying 15 Ltr petrol but did not get the chance to kill Vice President of India when he entered the Sri Fort Auditorium” the BJP MP said in the conversation aired on the channel.

The activists vandalised the office premises of the channel and the same happened in the presence of police. Keeping security measures in mind, the entire office was sealed later.

There is no immediate report of any injury though property was vandalised.

Speaking of the news reporter on of the Arnab Goswami, editor of a news channel, condemned the entire attack. He added “This is an open attack on free journalism. How can all these happen in the presence of the police?”

“All those activists who dared to enter the premises and destroyed public property must be severely punished” Arnab demanded.

Giving an immediate reaction on the entire situation and reminiscing about other attacks of various news channels, Lalu Prasad Yadav said “No party or private organisation has any right to attack the news channel, destroy public property and create an atmosphere of fear. All those who were involved in the vandalization must be put behind the bars,” he demanded.

Dear Lalu Prasad Yadav, You have arrogated to yourself the right to exult in every anti-Hindu posture and as long as you think the Muslim gallery you play to is pleased you feel justified. When Hindus protest, you try to muffle such protests by terming it as violence. You never see Muslim terrorism which exists and see Hinduism terrorism which does not exist. In Godhra you have arranged to bring out a report that Hindus killed Hindus in the train and the Muslims were innocent. You have paraded an Osama bin Laden look-alike during your election campaigns and consider it secularism. You support minority religious reservation even at the expense of OBC reservation. The other members of your Secular Party of India - Mulayam Singh Yadav, Ram Vilas Paswan, Vrinda Karat are all after Muslim votes. With support of perverse Hindus like you, Indian Muslims no longer need to look to Pakistan for support - they have Pakistanis in India itself. But remember, Hindus are no longer shy of protesting and they know how to pay Islamic terrorists back in the same coin. Enemies of Hinduism, beware!

http://www.zeenews.com/news641472.html

India’s Home Secretary a terrorist? So says Pak Foreign Secreatry

16/07/2010

New Delhi: The official machinery finally kicked into action here on Friday over the controversial remark of Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi when he equated rabble-rouser and mastermind of 26/11 Mumbai attack Hafiz Saeed to India’s Home Secretary G K Pillai.

On the issue of "hate speeches" by Jamaat-ud-Dawa chief Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, Qureshi said both sides needed to refrain from negative speeches. But in the same breath, he said "on the eve of this dialogue, tell me to what extent" did the Indian Home Secretary's remarks help -- a reference to G K Pillai's remarks at the Idea Exchange programme of The Indian Express this week, in which he blamed the ISI for "controlling and coordinating" the 26/11 terror attacks "from the beginning till the end".
In a way, he equated Saeed's recent anti-India speech in Lahore wherein he called for waging a war against India to the remarks of Pillai.
And then he said his Indian counterpart S M Krishna agreed on this. Qureshi and Krishna were addressing a news conference in Islamabad on Thursday night after talks between the two nations.
Surprisingly, Krishna did not rebut Qureshi's remarks on Pillai.

The BJP on Friday fumed at Krishna's silence and regretted that the Home Secretary was not "defended" when he was "openly castigated" by Qureshi.
The Congress on its part described as ridiculous any attempt by Pakistan to equate Pillai's remarks with Jamaat-ud-Dawah(JuD) chief Hafiz Saeed's anti-India hate speeches.
"The Foreign Minister of Pakistan chose to attack India's Home Secretary. I regret he was not defended there by India's Foreign Minister," BJP spokesman Ravi Shankar Prasad said, a day after Qureshi's unexpected attack on Pillai at a joint news conference with Krishna after their talks in Islamabad.
Congress spokesman Abhishek Singhvi said, "The Home Secretary was simply making a statement of fact about what India's stand has been, It is only India's stand. I don't think there is any basis for comparison of statements by Hafiz Saeed or Salahuddin with the Home Secretary. That would be ridiculous."
Singhvi also noted that Krishna has not confirmed Qureshi's remarks that both the ministers were of the opinion that Pillai's comments on ISI's role in 26/11 were "uncalled" for.

Prasad while offering his preliminary comments on the outcome of the Indo-Pak talks said Qureshi was making an issue out of Pillai's statement which was nothing but a statement of LeT operative and Pakistani-American David Headley about the role of ISI in Mumbai attack. Headley has confessed to his involvement in 26/11 and is currently in FBI custody in Chicago in the US.
"They have no reply or content but they are comparing it (Pillai's remarks) with Hafiz Saeed without taking any action," Prasad said.
Qureshi's criticism was noteworthy as it was in response to a question on the anti-Indian rhetoric of Saeed and he cited Pillai's comments as a counter. Krishna's silence when Pillai was attacked by the Pakistani minister has raised eyebrows.
Pillai had early this week blamed Pakistan's powerful Inter Services Intelligence(ISI) agency for "controlling and coordinating" the Mumbai terror attacks in 2008 "from the beginning to the end".
Source: India Syndicate and IANS

K.Venugopal
#1
Friday, 16 July 2010 14:33:03
India is wasting its time talking to Pakistan. We should break off diplomatic relations with Pakistan and be prepared to attack terrorist camps within Pakistan. By engaging us in talks they are only diverting our attention from their nefarious designs on our nation through terrorism. We should not be lulled into complacency in the name of giving diplomacy a chance. They are only taking us for a ride.

http://news.in.msn.com/national/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4159467&page=0

Thursday, July 15, 2010

'I've asked the President to visit state'

15 Jul 2010, 1512 hrs IST
Karnataka Governor H R Bharadwaj speaking exclusively to TIMES NOW, hits out at the BJP for blaming him for the present crisis in the state.

H R Bharadwaj has hit out at the BJP and also the Karnataka Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa. He has said the BJP cannot subdue him and he will not let the BJP government to loot the state.

The Karnataka Governor blaming the BJP for the crisis said, "State government cannot subdue me. Let the BJP leaders close their crisis. I won't allow them to loot Karnataka. I have asked the President to visit the state."

Bharadwaj reacting to BJP's allegations against him that he was acting as an agent of the Congress, said, "Yeddyurappa's own ministers are not cooperating with him. His government needs to do soul searching."

The Governor's explosive charge comes after the BJP accused him of acting as a Congress agent.

Karnataka Home Minister VS Acharya has said Governor Bharadwaj should not have gone to the media. He said they have no problem with him speaking to heads of state, but going to the media is unacceptable.

The Opposition Congress and JDS members continued their protest in the Karnataka Legislative Assembly for the third straight night demanding a CBI inquiry into the alleged illegal mining scam. Opposition members spent the night in the Assembly amid signs that there would be no let-up in their stand demanding a CBI probe into the illegal iron ore mining and export scam that they allege is to the tune of Rs 20,000 crore.


I am a BJP supporter but I think the blackmailing Reddy brothers should be in prison. However, the Governor is getting unduly excited. He can intervene only if there is a constitutional crisis and in this case nothing of that sort has surfaced. There is an elected government to run the affairs of the state. It is not the governor's job to govern the state. He needs to be recalled.

http://www.timesnow.tv/Why-is-BJP-blaming-me-for-their-crisis/articleshow/4349633.cms

Mulayam seeks pardon from Muslims over Kalyan

Updated on Thursday, July 15, 2010, 17:41 IST
Lucknow: In an attempt to mend fences with Muslims after having aligned with Kalyan Singh during Lok Sabha polls, SP supremo Mulayam Singh Yadav on Thursday regretted taking support of those "responsible" for the Babri mosque demolition and sought pardon of the community.

"In the last Lok Sabha polls, I had to take support of some 'galat tatva' (wrong elements) to keep communal forces at bay from forming government at the Centre. This confused the secular forces especially my Muslim brothers and their feelings were hurt. I accept my mistake and seek pardon of the Muslim community for my act", he said in a statement here.

He said, "I have already made public statement that I will never take support of those responsible for the Babri mosque demolition in the future.

"I want to assure my Muslim brothers that whatever I have done will not be repeated and I will continue to raise voice in favour of the Muslim community", Yadav, whose Muslim vote bank eroded in the last election, said.

Yadav said that his life was an open book of struggle against communal forces.

"I always took initiatives to defeat communal forces and did my duty", he said, adding that in 1990 as a chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, he took all the measures to save Babri mosque in Ayodhya.

However, on December 6, 1992, the mosque was demolished during the leadership of the then chief minister, who also was held responsible for the act, Yadav said, in an obvious reference to Kalyan Singh, who had quit BJP last year.

The SP, which had won only 23 out of the 80 Lok Sabha seats in UP, had accepted that it core Muslim voters had drifted to others parties.

PTI

Dear Mulayam, It would be a good idea if you also apologized to the Muslims for being a Hindu. Or better still, you might circumcise yourself and publicly accept Islam as your religion. Maybe you can also invite all true secularists in India to join you in your conversion. What better way to ensure Muslim votes?

http://www.zeenews.com/news641067.html

Over 50,000 I-T officers on token strike

Updated on Thursday, July 15, 2010, 10:00 IST
Mumbai: Over 50,000 Income Tax Officers and staff across the country will observe a token strike Thursday to press their demands, which include putting an end to outsourcing of departmental functions at the central processing centre (CPC) in Bangalore, among others.

The strike is called by the joint council of action (JCA) which comprises the Income Tax Employees Federation (ITEF) and Income Tax Gazetted Officers Association (ITGOA) to press for their 12-point demands.

"Despite repeated attempts, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) hasn't shown any seriousness in implementing any of our demands," ITGOA general secretary and JCA joint convenor Rajesh D Menon said.

"At our meeting with the CBDT chairman an agreement was reached that only the technical work will be outsourced and the work hitherto done by the employees will not be outsourced at the CPC. But against the agreement, now almost all the work is outsourced," Menon said.

Of the total 600 people working in the CPC, only 32 are from the I-T department. As a result, over 80 per cent of the total 3.5 lakh returns processed at the CPC by private vendors have returned for rectification, he claimed.

The JCA is also highlighting the delayed promotion to the post of assistant commissioners which is having a cascading effect on the lower levels, among others like reimbursement of mobile phone charges, filling up vacant posts and expedite the proposals by cadre review committee.

PTI

Among the issues for which the income tax officers are striking include the issue of outsourcing of departmental functions. The ITOs are upset with this arrangement for one and only one reason - their opportunity to squeeze money from assessees’ in refund cases have dried up. In short, they want outsourcing to end so that they can continue in their corrupt ways!

K.Venugopal - Mumbai



http://www.zeenews.com/news641019.html

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

France parliament votes to ban burqa

France's lower house of parliament has overwhelmingly approved a ban on wearing burqa-style Islamic veils, part of a determined effort to define and protect French values that has disconcerted many in the country's large Muslim community.
Proponents of the law say face-covering veils don't square with the French ideal of women's equality or its secular tradition. The bill is controversial abroad but popular in France, where its relatively few outspoken critics say conservative President Nicolas Sarkozy has resorted to xenophobia to attract far-right voters.
The ban on burqas and niqabs will go in September to the Senate, where it also is likely to pass. Its biggest hurdle will likely come after that, when France's constitutional watchdog scrutinizes it. Some legal scholars say there is a chance it could be deemed unconstitutional.
The issue has been debated across Europe, and Spain and Belgium have similar bans in the works. In France, which has Europe's largest Muslim population, about 5 million of the country's 64 million people are believed to be Muslim. While ordinary headscarves are common in France, only about 1,900 women are believed to wear face-covering veils.
The main body representing French Muslims believes such garb is not suitable in France, but it fears the ban will stigmatize all Muslims.
Malika Hamidi, director general of the European Muslim Network think tank, said she is very worried. The ban's backers are "playing up a feeling of fear of Islam" at a time when Europe is concerned about its changing identity, struggling to manage its diversity and dealing with an economic crisis, she said.
In Tuesday's vote at the National Assembly, there were 335 votes for the bill and just one against it. Most members of the main opposition group, the Socialist Party, walked out and refused to vote, though they in fact support a ban. They simply have differences over where it should be enforced, underscoring the lack of controversy among French politicians on the issue.
The bill passed Tuesday bans face-covering veils everywhere that can be considered public space, even in the street, but the Socialists only want it in certain places, such as government buildings, hospitals and public transport.
France's government has insisted that assimilation is the only path for immigrants and minorities, and last year it launched a grand nationwide debate on what it means to be French. The country has had difficulty integrating generations of immigrants and their children, as witnessed by weeks of rioting by youths, many of them minorities, in troubled neighborhoods in 2005.
At the National Assembly, few dissenters spoke out about civil liberties or fears of fanning anti-Islam sentiment.
Legislator Berengere Poletti, of Sarkozy's party, said face-covering veils "are a prison for women, they are the sign of their submission to their husbands, brothers or fathers."
The niqab and burqa are also seen here as a gateway to extremism and an attack on secularism, long a central value of France.
Discussions in France have dragged on for more than a year, since Sarkozy declared in June 2009 that the burqa is "not welcome" in France.
There has been some concern the bill could prod terror groups to eye France or its citizens as potential targets. Following Sarkozy's comments, al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb issued a statement on Web sites vowing to "seek vengeance against France."
The legislation would forbid face-covering Muslim veils in all public places in France and calls for euro150 ($185) fines or citizenship classes, or both.
Socialist Senator Bariza Khiari, one of France's few Muslim politicians, fears some women targeted "will withdraw into themselves, stay in the house, and instead of doing education projects, we're doing a ban, which I regret."
The bill also is aimed at husbands and fathers - anyone convicted of forcing someone else to wear the garb risks a year of prison and a euro30,000 ($38,000) fine, with both penalties doubled if the victim is a minor.
Officials have taken pains to craft language that does not single out Muslims. While the proposed legislation is colloquially referred to as the "anti-burqa law," it is officially called "the bill to forbid concealing one's face in public."
It refers neither to Islam nor to veils. Officials insist the law against face-covering is not discriminatory because it would apply to everyone, not just Muslims. Yet they cite a host of exceptions, including motorcycle helmets, or masks for health reasons, fencing, skiing or carnivals.
In March, France's highest administrative body, the Council of State, warned that the law could be found unconstitutional. It said that neither French secularism nor concerns about women's equality, human dignity or public security could be legal justifications.
Anticipating a ban on the veils, an entrepreneur who tried to run for president in 2007, Rachid Nekkaz, is creating a fund to pay the fines of anyone caught wearing a niqab or burqa.
While he says he opposes the full veils, he says a ban would be anti-democratic, and he is creating the fund "so that my country is not the disgrace of the whole world."
In Cairo, Islamic scholar Abdelmotie Bayoumi said a French ban would not violate Islamic law, but would violate personal freedoms.
"The niqab has no strong legitimacy based on the Quran or in examples from the Prophet's life that makes it a religious imposition on women. A Muslim woman wears the niqab not because of religious duty, but as a personal freedom," said Bayoumi, whose books include "Contemporary Testimonies," about the full-face veil.

The French politicians must be respected for refusing to be overwhelmed by what to their tradition is an alien culture. There is a lesson here that India could profit by because we seem to have forgotten that there is something like Indian nationalism that alone has resulted in this ancient nation still surviving. India was partitioned due to the weakness of national identity at that time. Continued failure to strengthen Indian national identity would allow all sorts of foreign influences to rip apart our society. Therefore we must beware of allowing alien influences like the Jihadi mindset to overwhelm us.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/france-parliament-votes-to-ban-burqa/646001/0

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

RSS ready to cooperate in blasts probe

Updated on Tuesday, July 13, 2010, 16:33 IST
New Delhi: RSS Tuesday said its functionaries will "cooperate" with agencies probing alleged links of Hindu groups in certain bomb blast cases, but termed as "baseless" suggestions that some of its members were involved in the crimes.

"As long as investigations go on in a professional manner and they want cooperation, (RSS) functionaries are ready to extend cooperation," Sangh leader Ram Madhav told reporters here.

But at the same time he said that if investigations into the blasts took a "political turn and if vendetta becomes the motive, the RSS will have to take stock of the situation."

Madav termed as "baseless" reports that certain senior RSS functionaries were involved in the incidents and were being interrogated.

"There were certain charges about individuals and the agencies wanted some cooperation from our functionaries. They have extended full cooperation to the agencies," he said.

The Sangh's response came following reports that two of its senior functionaries were interrogated by CBI for allegedly sheltering Mecca Masjid blast accused.

PTI

The so-called Hindu terrorism, if it has actually come into play, would only be a reaction to unchecked Islamic terrorism, largely sponsored by Pakistan and against which the UPA government has been reluctant to act sternly for fear of alienating its Muslim voters. The RSS does not subscribe to any terrorist ideology and has achieved sustained success in over 8 decades of its existence without resorting to violence, except in some parts of the country where violence has been thrust upon it, like in Kerala. However, an organization that has attracted millions and is seen by the Indian masses as a bulwark against anti-national forces would naturally be looked upon to counter all attacks upon the integrity of the nation. The RSS has never severed, even though it has an highly disciplined and militaristically trained cadre, from its time honoured tradition of peaceful selfless service to society at all levels. It has a reputation of being the foremost nation-building enterprise in India. It was at one time famously said by communists that if they had 1/10th of the strength of the RSS, they would have seized power in India! Thus, a solution by resorting to violence was never in the radar of RSS thoughts. Nevertheless, a response to Islamic terrorism, which is seen as a direct threat to the integrity of India, would have exercised the thoughts of all patriots, whether of the RSS or not. It is only natural that some might have thought it would be befitting to pay back in the same coin. While taking law into one's hands cannot be condoned, a response from patriotic sentiments has to be seen differently. In other words, while violence cannot be accepted, violence to defend national integrity cannot be condemned either. If it is done, then patriots would lose their morale and the nation would be even more vulnerable. Therefore those found to be involved in any "Hindu terrorism" must not be paraded as a scourge and used to tarnish the RSS if any connection is established. Hindu terrorism must be seen as a warning of the inevitable Hindu retaliation in the wake of continued Islamic terrorism and failure of the Government to end such terrorism.

As it is not expected the that the UPA government would see Hindu terrorism as a patriotic response to anti-national terrorism, it is incumbent on the RSS to openly declare support to all such so-called terrorists and categorically stress that till the government takes a strong anti Islamic terrorism stand and not treat Muslim terrorists like sons-in-law, Hindu terrorism is inevitable.


http://www.zeenews.com/news640585.html

Gandhiji Assassin Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court

Nathuram Godse was arrested immediately after he assassinatedGandhiji, based on a F. I. R. filed by Nandlal Mehta at the TughlakRoad Police staton at Delhi . The trial, which was held in camera,began on 27th May 1948 and concluded on 10th February 1949. He wassentenced to death. An appeal to the Punjab High Court, then insession at Simla, did not find favour and the sentence was upheld. The statement that you are about to read is the last made by Godsebefore the Court on the 5th of May 1949. Such was the power andeloquence of this statement that one of the judges, G. D. Khosla,later wrote, "I have, however, no doubt that had the audience of thatday been constituted into a jury and entrusted with the task ofdeciding Godse's appeal, they would have brought a verdict of 'notGuilty' by an overwhelming majority".

WHY I KILLED GANDHI
Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revereHindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore,been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developeda tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegianceto any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively forthe eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birthalone. I openly joined anti-caste movements and maintained that allHindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious andshould be considered high or low on merit alone and not through theaccident of birth in a particular caste or profession. I used publiclyto take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands ofHindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangisparticipated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company ofeach other. I have read the speeches and writings of Dadabhai Naoroji,Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modernhistory of India and some prominent countries like England , France ,America and Russia . Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism andMarxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkarand Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these twoideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought andaction of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, thanany other single factor has done.

All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first dutyto serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen.To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of somethirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitutethe freedom and the well-being of all India , one fifth of human race.This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the HinduSanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe,could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan , myMotherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well. Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak,Gandhiji's influence in the Congress first increased and then becamesupreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in theirintensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violencewhich he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible orenlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there isnothing new or original in them. They are implicit in everyconstitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream ifyou imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capableof scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal lifefrom day to day. In fact, honour, duty and love of one's own kith and kin and countrymight often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. Icould never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression isunjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and,if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In theRamayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita..[In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; andArjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends andrelations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on theside of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama,Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a totalignorance of the springs of human action. In more recent history, itwas the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checkedand eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It wasabsolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressiveAfzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. Incondemning history's towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap andGuru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposedhis self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violentpacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name oftruth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru willremain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen for ever for thefreedom they brought to them.

The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in hislast pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that theexistence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhihad done very good in South Africa to uphold the rights and well-beingof the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to Indiahe developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be thefinal judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted hisleadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, hewould stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way. Againstsuch an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had tosurrender its will to his and had to be content with playing secondfiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics andprimitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was theJudge of everyone and every thing; he was the master brain guiding thecivil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of thatmovement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. Themovement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster andpolitical reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma'sinfallibility. 'A Satyagrahi can never fail' was his formula fordeclaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what aSatyagrahi is. Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his owncause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a mostsevere austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character madeGandhi formidable and irresistible. Many people thought that hispolitics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from theCongress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with as heliked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi wasguilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster afterdisaster.

Gandhi's pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverseattitude on the question of the national language of India. It isquite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted asthe premier language. In the beginning of his career in India, Gandhigave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did notlike it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani. Everybodyin India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has nogrammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect; it is spoken, butnot written. It is a bastard tongue and cross-breed between Hindi andUrdu, and not even the Mahatma's sophistry could make it popular. Butin his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani aloneshould be the national language of India. His blind followers, ofcourse, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to beused. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted toplease the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of theHindus. From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the MuslimLeague began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell,though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powersunder the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murderand arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi withsome retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed inSeptember was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from itsinception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to thegovernment of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi'sinfatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bringabout a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Logwas followed by King Stork. The Congress which had boasted of itsnationalism and socialism secretly accepted Pakistan literally at thepoint of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India wasvivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign landto us from August 15, 1947. Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as thegreatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. Theofficial date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, butMountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisectedIndia ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved afterthirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congressparty calls 'freedom' and 'peaceful transfer of power'. TheHindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state wasestablished with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they havecalled 'freedom won by them with sacrifice' - whose sacrifice? Whentop leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and torethe country - which we consider a deity of worship - my mind wasfilled with direful anger. One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fastunto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindurefugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violentattacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest andcensure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi wasshrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had heimposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan ,there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shownsome grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reasonthat he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. Hewas fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at allperturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardlyattached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi. Gandhi is beingreferred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he hadfailed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherouslyto the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it.

I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be theFather of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power and hisdoctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbledbefore Jinnah's iron will and proved to be powerless. Brieflyspeaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined,and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing buthatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuablethan my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I feltthat the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely beproved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armedforces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but thenation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan . People may evencall me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nationwould be free to follow the course founded on the reason which Iconsider to be necessary for sound nation-building. After having fullyconsidered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, butI did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in bothmy hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, onthe prayer-grounds of Birla House. I do say that my shots were firedat the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin anddestruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery bywhich such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason Ifired those fatal shots. I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the presentgovernment owing to their policy which was unfairly favourable towardsthe Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policywas entirely due to the presence of Gandhi.
Posted by DEEPAK TRALSHAWALA at 8:58 AM 1 comments:
Venu said...
It appears from Nathuram Godse's final address to the Court that the reason he decided to kill Gandhi was by that he hoped the policies of Muslim appeasement followed by the Congress government would cease. Alas, nothing of that sort happened. In fact, the Congress government went on to institutionalize the art of appeasement and today it is on the brink of introducing reservations on religious basis, a move that is but a plot to destroy national identity in India. Not only did Godse err in judging the result of his action, he actually contributed to strengthening the very result he feared. Had the Mahatma continued to live, the Congress would have sidelined him and the sheen on Congress itself would have worn off. In all probability "Hindu Sanghtanist ideology" would have come on its own and challenged Congress. But instead, Godse managed to discredit them and give a long lease of life to the Congress and its Muslim appeasement policies.
July 13, 2010 2:29 AM

http://deepaktralshawala.blogspot.com/2009/12/nathuram-godse-hero-or-hamlet.html?showComment=1279013360970_AIe9_BE0XddXPp9gJUGrT2R2X9Jpr5f7hUfqvvPj0b7nAvH8lWkn7XWNq_FMmBPXFo2wBJDuunuof8QcgS9R259-A6GCumvnkKYla6O9o4XLi1fpKJP9MgZLc0O-JN7oqWu2l9NLWZGHMvH82O6xZ8ZgqODtW4BKHaMa7SPQ-ejC4P5AUohVv50kz4X8lLycP_kkgUVRQu3HwYqj8OhxdR7cur0ScUdm86L-jYDR1Dvshk7Fju6Vbo5Kfyq816oN1ix9SG30CML_XnG22MoMIuBwb31uyEgdpwYGUSIycvrF1GPA7cg_HrEVs4BaughoSm1SUvs9DSUGQLf2zzdHtu45AxI5HqIuoSBTb9rgU704Eyk0ayZaWCmOiCEIPksDzjw7WmvfJwLH9GmtKb-q-za5ZuSA-Cbbb2sGMZtaXYd18xalFDTWqkok_jGKUHlQujJlUXGysTno5fUj4gYDJwCtTWlx5XbaCGcDB_pf51cg2EHfASJ547MeV7NciiSvtA_R1o1-R1F_QFQqnfkO0SdzpFxC7kojkNm2BmP-chLHX5mTOI6utKv3NQ3DmD-Fzyf_rzR_WCJAvTT9f-KowZjTGATSJLecq31ZcHIpifBvdQNDqWCjFni6clkzewN61qh18bBMDnosRnKflLrZTqmuCMnTDJHPoxKIr31TJT0nAQ62z0HA90W2J7hJkP4ViHpaZnQkv-tKoNB2tFCSOqBL1-MxdsnvVehUtW0YRpJqGQCt_PRt97O15rfvch7TLD-gvY4aYMBYG5BCG0-HMWZ3vQBvt0eXNu_xpLT5vrHGHSWrMygo6CDIb9cJPdWhJN0y6DV1SS6aKtAN-IZlC6Xe8EUT9d5b5ZuJNYkSmZypTAKt9Wi0UBk7NQThePNp4Aj2d84Y7lpxA8m8wgFBcd2g3QebgGcVaNp-f-EjAqyXQwTp9MOEGAuxx-ri4NaUdJ4iW_VJRGHYshUzw8Od5IY6pYJiK5ebaQVxD_2wlFCO_4RIGgINZ6DroIL64LXCjTIXz-Vdc-6t-6JdCbb9wubs_sifJzFDesYPVeRqJ3A9x-zGc_dMut2pREGsv2i5M_QoghicF6jboUDnX12lF9DqfLNjhR_U8Juk2-RlM7yJg5kJG4KSbsegfBXutVXN26nyuGiad8G5fPP56TmQxqxtsO-v3sULQPdHEPvKWB6PEyxoCO0cZFV0VSj24uApz9MihoBb_3b2uLfd16dOkHpS9jdDEG2U1wdOblnz6gwXjqkzZWdlLrFvfqsZ8XznE1BVP5Mbt-nVZ0o7_1iUK4ixBHsAl3lwurePKkJnvDgoCJH2_W0bwsA#c2847055125164074552

Monday, July 12, 2010

Shivaji `rides' back to test a government

12/07/2010

The Supreme Court has finally scotched the ban against American historian James Laine, whose book on Shivaji had enraged Maharashtra's Sambhaji brigade enough to run riot through the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute in 2004, destroying rare manuscripts and harassing scholars. The then Congress/NCP-led administration cravenly gave in to their bullying, slapping a ban on the book. Political parties across the spectrum vied with each other to speak for the uninformed hoodlums rather than for scholarship and free inquiry. And institution after institution acquiesced in this unofficial censorship, until even the Supreme Court gently suggested to Laine that he simply excise the offending bits and ponder "how the interests of justice would be best served."
Now, as the ban is lifted, the old hatreds have come rushing back -- the Sambhaji brigade has howled betrayal and threatened that if the government does not take action by August 15, "we will take action in our style." The MNS promised that it would burn every available copy and see how anyone managed to sell the book. Home minister R.R. Patil, speaking for the Congress-NCP government, said their opposition remained undiluted, and even the Samajwadi party presented the decision as a great insult to Maharashtra's moral fabric. Nor has the BJP emerged unscathed; it has hardly made an effort to rein in its ally, the Shiv Sena.
As it happens, the James Laine case has indeed become a litmus test for the state. The court's lifting of the ban has taken Maharashtra full circle, back where it all began -- the threats of vigilante justice, the deep and dangerous illiteracy (the book is an excavation of the Shivaji myth, not an authorised biography), and political rhetoric that ratchets up the anger instead of addressing it with a larger vision.
What happens next will reveal whether Maharashtra, long disfigured by its politics of violent resentment, can ever hope for better. Why must the agenda for its mainstream politics continually be set by the state's most obscurantist, hyper-nationalist fringe? When it comes to protecting an intellectual endeavour that has now been vetted by the court, will the state finally have the spine to stand up to the various Senas that menace it?
Source: The Indian Express

K.Venugopal
#1
Monday, 12 July 2010 14:50:48
If there is any book that calls for banning, this is the book. How can any writer, even under the guise of scholastics, question the parentage of a person? Can a writer do it simply on hearsay even if such hearsay was quoted by earlier writers? This is undoubtedly an attempt to tarnish the image of Shivaji, which is in keeping with the general trend to defame Hindu icons and I am surprised that the Supreme Court thought otherwise. The Government must file a review petition.


http://news.in.msn.com/national/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4143152&pgnew=true&_p=ec1da23c-9f81-46f4-b195-b712885a2e0f&_nwpt=1#uc2Lstec1da23c-9f81-46f4-b195-b712885a2e0f

Saturday, July 10, 2010

RSS top brass shielded Ajmer blasts' accused?


Updated on Saturday, July 10, 2010, 15:29 IST

Zeenews Bureau

New Delhi: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has reportedly claimed that two Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) leaders allegedly shielded the 2007 Ajmer blasts accused.


According to a report, two Uttar Pradesh RSS functionaries – Ashok Varshney and Ashok Berry – have confessed that they also organised accused Devender Gupta’s stay in Lucknow and Sitapur.


Two pilgrims were killed and nine others, including a child, were injured in the terror attack when a crude bomb went off at the sufi shrine of Khawaja Moinuddhin Chishti in Ajmer on October 12, 2007.

Meanwhile, the CBI director, Ashwini Kumar, has refused to divulge any details about the case, saying the investigating agency would be submitting its findings before the court soon.

The question is, when was the stay of the two functionaries arranged? That they were involved in the Ajmer blasts was a charge made for the first time only, I think, early this year. So how would anyone who arranged their stay know that they were accommodating terror accused?

http://www.zeenews.com/news639957.html

Friday, July 9, 2010

Gadkari refuses to apologise for Afzal Guru remark

9 Jul 2010, 1453 hrs IST, AGENCIES
Under attack from the Congress, BJP chief Nitin Gadkari on Friday (July 9) said he will not apologise for his remark that Parliament attack case convict Afzal Guru was a "son-in-law" of that party.

"I have said nothing wrong. I am sticking to my stand and so there is no need (to apologise)," Gadkari said when asked by a reporter here that the Congress had sought an apology for his comment.

He alleged that the government was sitting on the file relating to execution of Guru for the last four years. Chief Minister Sheila Dixit, he said, had stated it was done on the instructions from then Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil. Now the decision is pending with the President, he said.

"I have not made a wrong statement. They (Congress) should rather give a reply as to why they are not executing the orders of the Supreme Court," he said.

The BJP President had yesterday while addressing a rally here criticised the UPA government for not hanging Guru and asked, "Is Afzal Guru a son-in-law of the Congress and why is he being given special treatment?"

Reacting to Gadkari's comment, Congress said Gadkari has lost his mind and that he needed serious help. "The remark smacks of obscenity, obnoxiousness and obtuseness," Congress spokesman Manish Tiwari said in New
Delhi.

Tiwari further said, "It is very obvious that the esteemed president of the BJP has lost it completely. The BJP should take pity on him and deposit him into a psychiatric facility. The man needs serious help."

A son-in-law in India is a very pampered fellow. It is apt that Gadkari chooses to say that Afzal Mohammad is Congress's son-in-law. How are they not going out of their way to make this death-row villain feel comfortable - just like any Indian household would to a son-in-law. The last time Gadkari called Laloo Yadav and company lap dogs of Sonia. It appears Gadkari is going to be famous for his colourful metaphors. Incidentally, when Tony Blair was called a poodle of George Bush, there was no outrage anywhere. We need to appreciate metaphors more. Roll on, Gadkari - metaphorically speaking, that is.

http://www.timesnow.tv/Gadkari-refuses-to-apologise-for-Afzal-Guru-remark/articleshow/4349222.cms

Look who is in love with Sheila Dixit?

09/07/2010

Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit came in for praise from an unexpected quarter on Thursday when senior Delhi BJP leader Harsh Vardhan hailed her as one of the finest politicians in the Capital.

The BJP leader said he was an ardent "admirer" of Dikshit who carries a strong personality and led
Congress to three consecutive electoral victories in the city.

"I am an admirer of Sheila Dikshitji. I have the highest regard and greatest love for her personality. Her loving face, her smartness, psychological insight, her guts to take decisions even if it may be wrong really impresses me," Vardhan said at a function to release a book by journalist Sidharth Mishra here. "I wish you to occupy higher positions. We want you to rise to the highest level... We feel proud to say that she is our CM," he said.

However, he underlined her "failure" to provide adequate water and uninterrupted power supply to the citizens in her 12-year tenure as Chief Minister.

He also requested Dikshit to improve the "ramshackle transport system" and take steps to rid the Yamuna of pollution. Dikshit thanked Vardhan for his compliments and said she would strive hard to make Delhi a better city to live in.
Source: The Indian Express

K.Venugopal
#1
Friday, 09 July 2010 14:06:03
This is a cue for our politicians not to blindly criticize their political rivals but instead offer constructive criticisms. Those in power should also learn to accept suggestions from the opposition if the suggestions bear merit in itself. Once elections are over ruling and opposition parties must in partnership run the country in a professional way.


http://news.in.msn.com/national/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4133895&page=0