01/04/2010
New Delhi: As General VK Singh takes over as the chief of the Indian Army he asserted that India is ready for any challenge. Indian Army is well prepared to face any threat from China, he said.
The General also said that he will focus his attention on improving "internal health" of the force to weed out corruption. General VK Singh took over as the Army chief on Wednesday on the retirement of Gen Deepak Kapoor.
Commissioned into 2 Rajput in June 1970, Singh had been heading the army's Kolkata-based Eastern Command. A veteran of the 1971 India-Pakistan war and IPKF (Indian Peacekeeping Keeping Force in Sri Lanka) operations, Singh is a graduate of the US Army Infantry School and has also attended the US Army War College, Carlisle.
A senior army officer who has served with Singh said, "He is a stickler for rules and has zero tolerance for corruption. His personal conduct has been above the board."
General Singh ordered an inquiry into the Sukna land case and recommended strict action against four generals allegedly involved. Singh, a third-generation officer of the Rajput Regiment, hails from Bapoda village in Bhiwani.
An army spokesperson said Singh has vast operational experience in counter-insurgency operations, Line of Control and high-altitude environment.
General Vijay Kumar Singh will find any number of challenges that demand urgent attention. But the first and foremost task of the new Army chief is not difficult to discern. It is to restore the image of the army that has taken a battering in recent years amidst the many serious charges of corruption.
As the GOC-in-C of Eastern Command, General V.K. Singh squarely confronted a major scandal -- the Sukna landscam case -- and prevailed on the establishment to do the right thing. As chief, he must now initiate steps that will significantly dampen if not eliminate the sources of corruption in the Indian Army.
To be sure, no institution can be immune to the larger trend of declining ethical standards around it. Yet there is a strong case for ensuring that the armed forces, responsible for the defence of the country, are as insulated as possible from negative trends in the rest of the nation.
As the ultimate instrument of protection for the republic from threats abroad and at home, the Indian Army enjoys a very special respect and legitimacy. Delhi can't afford to lose the people's trust in the Army. This in turn will require not only systemic reforms that will take time to implement, but also immediate measures that can reinforce public confidence in the army and its leadership.
Civilian primacy over the military in our democracy does not mean that the chiefs of our armed forces have to be mute in the face of persistent neglect of national defence by incompetent bureaucrats and indifferent ministers.
A second task for General Singh is to make the Army an attractive career for young men and women.
Unless it takes urgent and special steps, the Army's officer shortage, now said to be running at more than 11,000, will only grow. The traditional regional and social catchment areas of the Indian army officer corps have long since begun to dry up. The Army must thus find ways to reach out to new sources. One possible approach might be to take the Sainik schools to regions and communities that have had little exposure to career possibilities with the army. By providing the opportunity to, as well as imparting the capability to, compete for positions in the armed forces, a targeted expansion of the Sainik school system could at once help spread the roots of the Indian army as well as make it an attractive vehicle of social mobility for many marginal sections of society.
A third task for the Army leadership is to develop more effective ways of intervening in policy debates within the government and improving its outreach to the public. The tendency for the chiefs to make impromptu pronouncements to reporters and TV crews has landed some of Singh's predecessors in political trouble.
Meanwhile, resentment within the Army and the other armed services is mounting at the perennial short shrift they get from the civilian bureaucracy, where the capacity to manage the nation's military appears to be eroding rapidly. The answer to this lies in the Army improving its institutional capacity to frame policy issues, to engage other governmental agencies, and to better communicate with the public -rather than the occasional public venting by the chief.
The biggest challenge, however, is the urgency of rapid modernisation. It won't be long before Singh finds himself as frustrated as his predecessors in the Army and colleagues in the Air Force and the Navy by the "masterly inactivity" that has now enveloped the defence ministry. So long as Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Congress President Sonia Gandhi are willing to tolerate the current drift in the Ministry of Defence, which returns year after year money meant for weapon purchases and undermines the efforts to build a modern defence industrial base, it would seem there is little anyone can do.
But it behoves the new Army chief, after he reviews the state of affairs on the needs of the Army, to point to the dangers to national security from further delays in the modernisation of the armed forces. Civilian primacy over the military in our democracy does not mean that the chiefs of our armed forces have to be mute in the face of persistent neglect of national defence by incompetent bureaucrats and indifferent ministers.
If he can make the Army's case calmly and in a sustained fashion, within the government and to the public, the new chief can make a huge difference to the national discourse on defence policy. And that surely is the least we should expect from the head of an institution that is among the oldest and the most professional the nation has had.
Source: The Indian Express and PTI
PreviousNext
K.Venugopal
#1
Thursday, 01 April 2010 14:45:36
Whether ready or not, we have to take on China if the situation so arises. So there is no need for any incoming army chief to particularly declare this. If it is meant to reassure the nation, I think the nation is not much reassured about anything these days - what with indifference and corruption widespread at all levels in our society. If he can indeed make the "internal health" of the army robust, then he would have gone a long way in reassuring the nation that we can take on anyone. Best wishes and luck to our new Chief.
http://news.in.msn.com/internalsecurity/news/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3764813&page=0
New Delhi: As General VK Singh takes over as the chief of the Indian Army he asserted that India is ready for any challenge. Indian Army is well prepared to face any threat from China, he said.
The General also said that he will focus his attention on improving "internal health" of the force to weed out corruption. General VK Singh took over as the Army chief on Wednesday on the retirement of Gen Deepak Kapoor.
Commissioned into 2 Rajput in June 1970, Singh had been heading the army's Kolkata-based Eastern Command. A veteran of the 1971 India-Pakistan war and IPKF (Indian Peacekeeping Keeping Force in Sri Lanka) operations, Singh is a graduate of the US Army Infantry School and has also attended the US Army War College, Carlisle.
A senior army officer who has served with Singh said, "He is a stickler for rules and has zero tolerance for corruption. His personal conduct has been above the board."
General Singh ordered an inquiry into the Sukna land case and recommended strict action against four generals allegedly involved. Singh, a third-generation officer of the Rajput Regiment, hails from Bapoda village in Bhiwani.
An army spokesperson said Singh has vast operational experience in counter-insurgency operations, Line of Control and high-altitude environment.
General Vijay Kumar Singh will find any number of challenges that demand urgent attention. But the first and foremost task of the new Army chief is not difficult to discern. It is to restore the image of the army that has taken a battering in recent years amidst the many serious charges of corruption.
As the GOC-in-C of Eastern Command, General V.K. Singh squarely confronted a major scandal -- the Sukna landscam case -- and prevailed on the establishment to do the right thing. As chief, he must now initiate steps that will significantly dampen if not eliminate the sources of corruption in the Indian Army.
To be sure, no institution can be immune to the larger trend of declining ethical standards around it. Yet there is a strong case for ensuring that the armed forces, responsible for the defence of the country, are as insulated as possible from negative trends in the rest of the nation.
As the ultimate instrument of protection for the republic from threats abroad and at home, the Indian Army enjoys a very special respect and legitimacy. Delhi can't afford to lose the people's trust in the Army. This in turn will require not only systemic reforms that will take time to implement, but also immediate measures that can reinforce public confidence in the army and its leadership.
Civilian primacy over the military in our democracy does not mean that the chiefs of our armed forces have to be mute in the face of persistent neglect of national defence by incompetent bureaucrats and indifferent ministers.
A second task for General Singh is to make the Army an attractive career for young men and women.
Unless it takes urgent and special steps, the Army's officer shortage, now said to be running at more than 11,000, will only grow. The traditional regional and social catchment areas of the Indian army officer corps have long since begun to dry up. The Army must thus find ways to reach out to new sources. One possible approach might be to take the Sainik schools to regions and communities that have had little exposure to career possibilities with the army. By providing the opportunity to, as well as imparting the capability to, compete for positions in the armed forces, a targeted expansion of the Sainik school system could at once help spread the roots of the Indian army as well as make it an attractive vehicle of social mobility for many marginal sections of society.
A third task for the Army leadership is to develop more effective ways of intervening in policy debates within the government and improving its outreach to the public. The tendency for the chiefs to make impromptu pronouncements to reporters and TV crews has landed some of Singh's predecessors in political trouble.
Meanwhile, resentment within the Army and the other armed services is mounting at the perennial short shrift they get from the civilian bureaucracy, where the capacity to manage the nation's military appears to be eroding rapidly. The answer to this lies in the Army improving its institutional capacity to frame policy issues, to engage other governmental agencies, and to better communicate with the public -rather than the occasional public venting by the chief.
The biggest challenge, however, is the urgency of rapid modernisation. It won't be long before Singh finds himself as frustrated as his predecessors in the Army and colleagues in the Air Force and the Navy by the "masterly inactivity" that has now enveloped the defence ministry. So long as Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Congress President Sonia Gandhi are willing to tolerate the current drift in the Ministry of Defence, which returns year after year money meant for weapon purchases and undermines the efforts to build a modern defence industrial base, it would seem there is little anyone can do.
But it behoves the new Army chief, after he reviews the state of affairs on the needs of the Army, to point to the dangers to national security from further delays in the modernisation of the armed forces. Civilian primacy over the military in our democracy does not mean that the chiefs of our armed forces have to be mute in the face of persistent neglect of national defence by incompetent bureaucrats and indifferent ministers.
If he can make the Army's case calmly and in a sustained fashion, within the government and to the public, the new chief can make a huge difference to the national discourse on defence policy. And that surely is the least we should expect from the head of an institution that is among the oldest and the most professional the nation has had.
Source: The Indian Express and PTI
PreviousNext
K.Venugopal
#1
Thursday, 01 April 2010 14:45:36
Whether ready or not, we have to take on China if the situation so arises. So there is no need for any incoming army chief to particularly declare this. If it is meant to reassure the nation, I think the nation is not much reassured about anything these days - what with indifference and corruption widespread at all levels in our society. If he can indeed make the "internal health" of the army robust, then he would have gone a long way in reassuring the nation that we can take on anyone. Best wishes and luck to our new Chief.
http://news.in.msn.com/internalsecurity/news/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3764813&page=0
No comments:
Post a Comment